Spay or neuter retired breeding stock? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by fm2410 on 28 September 2007 - 18:09

Is it common practice to spay or neuter retired breeding stock. I can see why spaying would be done. But would you also neuter  retired males.  Would there be any health benifits of neutering a 10 year old? Just curious.


4pack

by 4pack on 28 September 2007 - 19:09

Not unless they are having prostate issues. Why put an older dog under anesthesia for something not life threatening?


Rezkat5

by Rezkat5 on 28 September 2007 - 19:09

I wouldn't neccessarily neuter a retired male unless they are having problems.  However, spaying for sure yes,  after just seeing two older females have to go through an emergency spay due to pyometras in the past week.  One nearly died because of her pyo due to the fact that she was septic at that point.  One was 12 the other was 15.  The 15 year old had a grade 5/6 heart murmor and she did great.  The 12 year old was the one that was septic.  That being said I see several older animals including my own 16 year old that surprisingly due well under anesthesia for an emergency bloat surgery.  The agents used these days are exactly the same as what they use in humans and I think that they tend to do alot better then many years ago.   We routinely put most animals on IV fluids for their procedure and they are monitored just the same as a human would be.  The only ones that don't are the young spay/neuters and very very short procedures.  And alot of times if it's a small lump removal or something we will try to do the procedure under a local with very light sedation, not general anesthesia.  Anesthesia does have its risks and everytime I am knocked out for something, which is way too frequently these days!  I always wonder if I'm going to wake up!  Propofol is a wonderful injectable agent that any vet hospital that is "with the times" should be using.  I know, because I've had it several times now! 

 


by JGA on 28 September 2007 - 21:09

I've always spayed retireing females and only neutered males if they have a prostate problem, which hasn't happened often in my dogs (maybe the Saw Palmeto the get?) . I have found that when middle age or older dogs are steralized they often develop thyriod problems, so you have to test them every 6 months to be sure all is still OK.


by Trafalgar on 28 September 2007 - 23:09

My opinion is that should be done, if it's a response to a medical condition. I don't believe sterilzation is good as a prophylactic measure. Many people are mistaken about what they believe to be the benefits. Some cancers and problems are MORE prevalent in sterilized dogs than in whole specimens. At the very least folks should educate themselves as to the risks as well as considering the benefits. The following is a link of a nice blog entry about spaying and neutering. I found the back and forth messages after the article as interesting as the original entry. http://www.doggedblog.com/doggedblog/2006/05/its_just_that_t.html





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top