What do yu all think about this muzzle work? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

4pack

by 4pack on 19 September 2007 - 15:09

Too much fluff on this board lately. Lets talk a bit about this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmaNTn_lkz8&mode=related&search=

 


by Abhay on 19 September 2007 - 15:09

In point Karate, students are taught to come close, but pull their punches. The theory behind this is that if the time came one could always extend.

 When these point Karate Black Belts try to make the transition into full contact they found out that they couldnt punch through a wet paper bag and also that it hurts to get hit and they were like a fish out of water.

I use this analogy because any living thing in a real life situation will react the way it trains. Be it animal or human its the same. If the dog is trained over and over using that muzzle, when the muzzle is removed the dog will eventually not take hold in any situation. I am totally against such training.


Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 19 September 2007 - 15:09

Interesting. I had exactly the opposite reaction. My thoughs were: God help the decoy if the dog were to get that muzzle off! He seems very keen to bite.

 


shasta

by shasta on 19 September 2007 - 15:09

I have never trained muzzle work though just had a conversation with someone who had the other night. It sounded like the best dogs in muzzle work are those that really want to fight with the decoy (not just chase around prey). I didn't get into depth conversation on how it was trained but it seemed to me like these dogs also know how to bite and do it well, and THEN are trained on the muzzle work. Seemed like using your same analogy it would be like the karate black belt that IS in full contact taking the hits and throwing the hits, THEN restrained to pull up their punches. They can still do it, but are then restrained....seems like the frustration level would go up and they'd really want to fight. the dog looked like he wanted to fight the decoy (hard to see on my little laptop screen though:-))

sueincc

by sueincc on 19 September 2007 - 15:09

It's my understanding with muzzle work the dog learns to use his body to fight, not just depend on his grip.  Since these same dogs do bite work first, plus during and after,  I don't understand your analogy abhay.


by Abhay on 19 September 2007 - 16:09

Shasta,

 Any full contact fighter would rather slit their wrists than practice control. I guarantee you if that dog keeps wearing that muzzle for months and months of training, it will affect it's bite work in a negative way, BIGTIME.


Ryanhaus

by Ryanhaus on 19 September 2007 - 16:09

You could see at one point the dog actually standing on the decoy, and holding him down,

he realized he could not bite, so he thought of another way................


shasta

by shasta on 19 September 2007 - 16:09

that's the point abhay, I"m pretty sure most of the muzzle work dogs don't wear the muzzle only for months and months and months, it seems like they would do some bite work as well before, during and after the muzzle training. Yes a full contact fighter probably WOULD rather slit his wrists then practice control, hence the level of frustration goes up. Lets say using your own analogy here that the full contact fighter was required to have some control put on him for a week lets say, or even a day...you better believe that the next time he gets to do full contact fighting he'd go at it with full force. The frustration at not being able to do it would make him more thirsty for it when he did get to do it (full contact fighting is not something I understand nor care to because I think the most I want to know about is self defense against someone like that...But still, I can use the analogy.

EKvonEarnhardt

by EKvonEarnhardt on 19 September 2007 - 16:09

OK I am going in a different direction on this . Who the hells just rolls around on the floor while a dog is pouncing on them ??"? this is where training these dogs is coming in to problems. Many of these dogs that are trained for police work or even PPD are not trained in REAL LIFE WORK. Did you hear the guy screaming/? yelling? even hit the dog? kick the dog? ANYTHING beside falling down (yes some were real but others were NOT) and rolling around? MAYBE it is just me and I think if it was a real life crimal that he would actually be screaming and trying to get away or at least get the dog off to run! Again just me.

I am not impressed with it at all.

 

As for muzzle work there are reasons to do it and IF done right then every effective!!!! (but this is not the case in this video)


by Abhay on 19 September 2007 - 16:09

I would like to pose a question for all who disagree with me.

Can someone please explain to me how this type of training benefits the dog?  Please don't say it teaches the dog how to use it's body.  A dog's main weapon is it's mouth.  To do a dog justice, he must be in hold and learn balance and leverage, while in Hold.

Muzzling the dog is like taping a human's hands into a ball and then having them wrestle or do rondori in Judo. They wouldn't learn the proper way to gain leverage or balance if they can't grab and grip. How can muzzle bite work be of benefit when your taking away the dog's main weapon?






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top