Is this ddr-dsh - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Kimmelot

by Kimmelot on 05 September 2010 - 22:09

Yes Maggie , this issues of attacking a ten year old issue has nothing to do with me wanting to board my dogs anywhere.

To attack a person, or distract from an argument to the character of the person opposing is called the Ad Hominem Fallacy. (Concider Ethics,Waller 2008, p 2) 

If you want to stay on some current news , why not then keep posting all the horrible things happening RIGHT NOW !   You cant ?   Is it because its not happening or is it because you are all being such bullies that she cannot allow anyone to come into her life, house, kennel without feeling parionoid that your going to "get her". All the sad comments made by her only conformate that she has a severe mental problem, and I am sad for her.. Continue to bully and you will CAUSE more mental anguish, and possibly endanger any animals in her grasp.

Can we all build eachother up ? Say a few kind words.. like , gee Janice I hope your dogs got ran today, or what kind of training are you into now ? Do you need some one to come and help you , or are you in control ? - see its not that hard.

Whisper


by VomMarischal on 05 September 2010 - 22:09

Whisper Honey, it's not a fallacy when she does it every ten years.

Edit to add: please go look at the long blue post on p. 3. See for yourself. She is at it again.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 05 September 2010 - 23:09

Continue to enable and she will be in the news again.

Kimmelot wake up.

I love how Maggie posts all these abuse videos but in 10 years it will be just fine. Give me a break.

If you are so concerned about her why don't or Maggie help her?

Kimmelot

by Kimmelot on 05 September 2010 - 23:09

VM - that was directed towards SlamDunc's comment for me to take my dogs to her for boarding. He was deflecting the point that she is an animal abuser , into making how I feel about boarding dogs with an animal abuser the issue making it about me instead of the point. 

Love you Mr. Puppet .. my 5 hour energy drink never kicked in :(

I am here in California , I have a phone, I am easy to locate, anyone can befriend me because I am available on diffrent forums and social pages. I already help other breeders place there dogs, I mentor, and YES I am willing to help anyone in need in any way I have available . I will not however listen to long rants, or allow some one stay in my life that continues to make bad choices.

I am here Janice if you do need help, and I don't mean help getting these monkeys off your back but I do mean if you need some one to listen or talk dogs to.

Whisper


by VomMarischal on 05 September 2010 - 23:09

Whisper, the long blue rant was by Janice Bartmess. Not me. And it IS about what she is doing NOW. 

Kimmelot

by Kimmelot on 05 September 2010 - 23:09

Oh I know that VM , you don't have to worry , I am aware. What I am saying is that I won't sit on the phone and let people talk me into next tuesday :) Some people try to. One gal called me at 2 am.. my poor hubby was besides himself when I had to deal with that one, but I try to help people feel better about themselves, not bring them down.. because its not natural for me to be aggressive like that.

You where not anywhere in that paragraph, yet , unless you call me and then want to keep me on the phone for hours. lol

by VomMarischal on 05 September 2010 - 23:09

S'ok, Kid, I got to go to my Dad's b-day party. Have a great evening, rant-free!

DDR-DSH

by DDR-DSH on 06 September 2010 - 01:09

SP is not deterred by his "outing" as a hacker, so it looks like he will stay on, hoping to re-ingratiate himself with lots of shmoozing and ass kissing. He wishes people well, and "good night", etc. hoping that everyone will forget and this will blow over. Nope.. Not gonna let it happen.

I agree with someone else, SP, that you need a new ID (in addition to your aliases), but this one should be uniquely yours, so you can keep your avatar, and your intials? I think "Stinky Pooney" would work quite well. It's a little less raunchy than the other SP names I can think off. LOL


DDR-DSH

by DDR-DSH on 06 September 2010 - 01:09

When the trolls are all ready to call it quits for the day and report back to Ingrid, Wayne or possibly JP, then they will have to admit it was not a good day for the AR activists. They got found out, today. Now, I think you will not get away with so much, anymore. Oli will be watching you!


VonIsengard

by VonIsengard on 06 September 2010 - 03:09

I am not into the personal vendetta sh*t on this board.

I am not into the OT/political sh*t on this board.

This, however, is an issue I will never, never let go. Each and every person who uses this board and listens to what this excuse for a human being has to say needs to know the kind of person they are taking advice from.

I don't give a flying f*** if you're "overwhelmed". At some point, YOU make the choice to keep breeding litters you can't sell. YOU make the choice to obtain more dogs. YOU make the decision to let a dog rot in its own filth instead of letting it out to go to the bathroom. YOU make the choice to let a dog in your care go hungry.

And for the record, AR people can kiss my ample, steak eating, leather wearing @ss. This has nothing to do with AR whack jobs. This has to do with the neglect of dogs so severe that at least one of them had to be euthanized on the spot.

And if you stick up for this kind of behavior in my book you are just as bad.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top