26 year old Iraq Veteran Gunned Down At Home - Page 69

Is there anybody there ?

It says that was his last interview before he suddenly disappeared in 1998. Then later his tortured body washed up on the panama shore in 2007.

I'm reading his 12 hour transcript now, holy cows he was one of two survivors outta 14 in Operation Red Rock.   http://www.whale.to/b/chip.html

"Posted to South-East Asia as Airman First Class (A1C) in December 1970, he was assigned as a radio operator on a Forward Air Control (FAC) aircraft attached to Task Force Alpha at Nakhon Phanom, Thailand. In short order he was recruited (an involuntary "volunteer") to "Team Red Rock". The team was composed of eight US Army Green Berets, three US Navy SEALs and two "cowboys" - a euphemism for CIA paramilitary specialists. With Tatum attached, Team Red Rock totalled 14 in all, and was about to be tasked with an operation that came directly from the White House. "

"The plan called for the team to parachute into the outskirts of Phnom Penh, carrying captured NVA "Sappers" with them. Taken in unarmed and alive, the Sappers would be "sacrificed" and their bodies left to be discovered by Cambodian forces. A furious Lon Nol would assume North Vietnam was to blame. It was hoped that such an act would stiffen Lon Nol's backbone. With nowhere else to turn, the US puppet would urgently seek US hardware to strengthen his forces and continue the battle. "

"The team members were not told that they, too, were to be sacrificed by their President to ensure that word of the operation never reached the light of day. A detachment of Montagnard tribesmen ("the Yards"), in the pay of the CIA, was assigned to liquidate each member of the team and dispose of the bodies. The attack went successfully, but the team's suspicion of "the Yards" foiled the betrayal. Using their knowledge of "escape and evasion" tactics, the team decided to trek to the Vietnamese border and back to safety with US forces. "

OMG 
RIP Chip Tatum

gg, I think you are missing the point on wondering if I am expert on the subjects of this line of posts. It is irrelevant because the references I list speak for themselves (res ipsa loquitor and ipso facto). The experts I provide video statements of and the documents I list speak for themselves.  I am presenting material for each person who is interested to research on his own.  Verify everything for yourself.  Attacking me or trying to discredit me is not relevent.  What matters is what you think AFTER you do the best reserach possible with an open mind. By the way, I am an expert on what matters I post and others have recognized me for that publicly too.  But that is irrelevanta and does not affect the quality of the evidence prersented.
 
I am not asking you to trust me.  Reading and researching the leads I provide is strictly that.  You are not my client and I have made no claims that I am representing you.  If you are perhaps an attorney, and maybe live in driving distance to the Miamia area you should be able to get the WPLG court doc including depos, transcripts and affidavits. Or you can do it by mail if you are too far away and not an attorney. Actually one doesn't have to be an attorney but that makes it faster and easier to get access and have copies made.

Attacking me or trying to suggest that unless I am a publicly recognized expert that there is no value to looking at the references and evidence I cite is a basic flaw in your logic and either a "red herring", ad hominem attack or throwing the baby out with the bathwater because you don't like the messenger's message and blame him for its content. If you are an attorney you should realize that when the law is on one's side, you argue the law,  when the facts are on one's side you argue the facts.  When you have neither you just argue and try and impune the key witnesses credibility.  But you see, I am not a key witness here with this info (maybe I could be but here I am just the messenger) but that is not the case here, because the folks these references are about like Dr. Steve Pieczenik are the experts and are the ones' who have gone public and identified the folks who ran the 911 false flag/stand-down operation.

Since you commented on my spelling errors etc., I'll give you a little hint.  The answer lies in fuzzy logic, random generators, search engine technology and crypto. Think you can figuure that out? Maybe I am not as dumb as I choose to appear?

If you resent the messenger because you are offended by the content of the messages, why not consider that the messages might be true and then transfer your disgust to the corrupt officials in Govt, alphabets, and intel who run these RICO criminal programs? If you can't fit thses hypothesis and evidence into your head in order to fully evaluate them and process them and their meaning,  or are so offended you refuse to consider the evidence and research it, then it's not my fault.  And if you don't like this information and refuse to examine it closely and research it, then you are responding with purposeful ignorance.  A better response instead of attacking me or trying to do such so you can try to impune my credentials would be for you to stop reading any of these posts.  If ou are not interested in examining the available facts, then perhaps it is best for you to just avoid this line of posts.
So there you have it.  Cheers.

Baby Eagle, yes this man woke up and went public and became a hero.  Don't assume that he necessarily died the way the records suggest.  Sometimes those experienced in tradecraft buy bodies and use them to create their own death evidence, while they assume a new identity.  Sometimes these occurrences are part of a deal worked out with intel and that can go something like this:  you stop talking at this point, we stop harassing you and you get so much money if you accept our cover plan and just go away in exiled retirement. Some deep cover black ops are arkensided, many are framed and agree to a criminal conviction thus discrediting themselves from future grand jury or Congressional testimony, and some speak out for a while while they sit on "info/data caches" of compromising info spread out around the world with frienmds who will leak the info to agreeable sources if treachery is used against the op (this is called "mutual deterrence" and is commonly done either to establish a quid pro quo or to negotiate an exiled retirement with a new identity).

For those who want a great deal of inside information on this search out retire FAA inspector Rodney Stich, authorof the highly respected book, Defrauding America.  This book has been banned by most large bookstores and must be purchased directly from him.  There is a reason.  If you buy it and read it you will find out and learn a great deral from the testimony of actual deep cover ops included in the book, folks like Ron Rewald.

Of course if you want a real ride into the ozone (ether world), research attorney Paul Wilcher, Sarah McClendon, and Gunther Russbacker.  If that is not enough you can search out Kay Griggs and listen to as uch of her 8 hour video deposituion that you can handle about how our Govt is realy run and how wars are started by the "joint" and "shape".  Hint the joint is in NYC and not the JCS. Caution, not for the weakkneed(parts 2&3 removed, but you can find themin another form if you do some serious ebsearching. I suggest you use www.startingpage.com because it is proxied.  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=182423138094287597 

Former Asst Sec. of Defense under Pres. Ronald Reagan, Colonel Ronald C. Ray spoke out and stated that he thinks 911 was a false flag attack.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm 

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm

Do your own research on this and decide if you believe him or not.  I present his story for you to evaluate.  I am not stating that I accept it or not.  It is interesting that's for sure.


 

Thank you Preston for finally giving us your credentials.  However,  I still don't buy into all of your ideas.  And, I don't think you have the expertise to comment on all of the topics you discuss.  I do commend you for wanting to defend the Constitution though.

GG, think of it like a form of Tourette's-- somethings just need to run their course no matter what.



 

Good one beetree--whether Preston realizes it or not, my strategy worked.

I dunno but it's stories like this Chip Tatum that give me hope for America. If our government is this corrupt with the Military, CIA, NIH, FBI, MOSSAD .. there is no doubt in my mind America will survive as founded when TSHTF. There almost has to be a line drawn and 2 "elite" by now.

That transcript and the Operation Red Rock transcript named names, bank heads, dates, times, places, contacts everything and is 14 years old discribing the early 1970's threw the late 1990's. It's almost like reading a soldiers action movie script because it's all shock and awe. 

Now we have people like Ron Paul who has been defending America strictly for 30 years, yet only 1% of the American people knew his name last election cycle. That alone is staggering but understandable with our MSM. 

Now I can only assume why (with stories like this Chip Tatum) Ron Paul recieves more money from the Military than anyone else in election history. I always thought it was because of all the unConstitutional wars since WW2, and all the unConstitutional policies in the judicial, legislative and executive branches .. maybe I'm wrong (?) and it's because of people like this here Chip Tatum ? I mean how many Chip Tatums were out there, or better yet, how many are alive to whistleblow now or donate to elections ? The whole idea of follow the money just hit me in the head 10 fold. No kidding.

We NEED to get a FULL AUDIT of the FED books ... it's stories like Chip Tatum of why the FED refuses to allow a full and detailed audit. I'm convinced of it. Not just because of printed moneys for welfare, discount window hand outs and foreign war debts.

Thanks Preston for posting about this Chip Tatum, I just jumped into a whole new rabbit hole to blog with.

gg, again I say that I am just a messenger.  If I only had a GED, it wouldn't matter, since anyone can present evidence and sources for others to evaluate.  It doesn't matter what I think, only what each person that studies and researches the actual evidence thinks.  Everyone is entitled to their own opinions.  And I only gave you part of my credentials, maybe not the most important part either.  But that is irrelevant.  One of the smartest most knowledgable persons I ever met had a forth grade education and was self taught.  He borrowed books and read and studied them. He was allowed to take entrance exams and was so smart and did so well he was accepted directly into a major Vet school and became a leading Vet without any HS diploma or undergraduate degree. A fair amount of what I learned came from him.

Consider me equivalent to having a GED or less and start with that.  Better to evaluate the ideas I presented and weigh them by your analyses of the evidence you can find during your own research. It's what one decide after a thorough analysis with an open mind that counts for each person.  What I think personally is really irrelevant.  All matters must be evaluated by the best evidence.  Anyone who attacks the messenger and ignores the message is just acting ignorantly.  Like an ostrich putting his head in the sand to avoid noise. Insulting and attacking me is irrelevant and reflects on your personhood not mine.  If you do not like these ideas presented and are unwilling to check them out carefully and evaluate the available best evidence, then why waste your time even reading my postings or criticizing them. The major evidence and docs I referenced speak entirely for themselves as any person of normal mind and disposition can understand.

If others want more hypothesis or evidence ideas posted by me, say so and I will continue. 

gg and bee, no-one needs expertise in covert operations or spycraft to identify sources and evidence that is publicly published from respected sources, like major media reports of actual events or mentioning actual docs which are available. I may be an expert, I may not be. That is irrelevant. Laziness is not excuse for not doing the research of these sources and docs.  Without that any comments become meaningless and are viewed as ad homnem attacks or red herrings only.  If you don't accept the evidence I provided references too, that is certainly your right, but when you attack the messenger you show yourself to be violating basic rules of logic.  This is basic in Philosophy 1, you ought to know better, unless you have a different agenda like just arguing because you have no evidence to counter act the evidence I have referenced.  Still you refuse to discuss WPLG or the Finders or Operation Northwoods, etc. These docs have been cross validated many, many times.

.