Showlines, Working Lines - The ability to work - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mackenzie on 11 April 2009 - 05:04

To Changer

It is not the Breed Standard that has changed but the way people view it.  In my opinion it is the people that change when they cannot achieve what is desired and then they convince themselves and others they are correct.  Our dogs start to look different to the Standard, competition courses are made easier and judges that follow this practise do not help us keep going in the right direction.  The human error is to make life easy rather than make the effort to reach the high points.  For some, possibly the majority, they cannot achieve these high points.

Mackenzie

by lonewulf on 11 April 2009 - 11:04

Rules can never acheive results without enforcement. Whenever rules are designed to guide the acheivement of an outcome, there has always been the persistent efforts by some to claim the rewards of adherence without the discipline entailed for the same.

by Christopher Smith on 12 April 2009 - 05:04

If we bring back the debate on working..Why do they call them working line....

Why don't you title a dog and THEN form an opinoin?

by Christopher Smith on 12 April 2009 - 05:04

However, let us consider the part played by trainers.  Have the top working trainers been so wowed by working ability that they have abandoned the breed standard? 

Abandoned? That makes the assumption that they ever embraced it. Trainers are not breeders. They are end product users. Trainers will always find the dog that suits their needs best. If the SL dogs had the better structure and drives for work, we would see more trainers buying them, just like we see more trainers buying Malinois. Why would a trainer buy a dog that he can’t train for the job?  This problem rest squarely on the shoulders of the breeders.


sueincc

by sueincc on 12 April 2009 - 05:04

Okay, I'll bite:  What's  the "night test"?

by Mackenzie on 12 April 2009 - 06:04

Sorry Chris but I have to respectfully disagree with you.

Trainers were not born with all the knowledge that they have aquired over the years.  Quite often the first dog is bought because of the breed that it comes from, that being so, like all beginners the breed standard does carry some importance.  Also, not all trainers are end product users.   As I explained in an earlier post there are trainers who earn a living by training the dogs for other people just to pass the minimum requirement of Sch H1 to enable the animal to satisfy the breeding rules.   There are also the trainers who train for more serious work before passing them on to the handlers who then continue with the training for the rest of the animals working life.

The showline dogs are closer to the breed standard than working lines, however, many trainers do not consider their work drive high enough and, therefore, there is a tendency to lower their sights in favour of dogs who are less correct anatomically in favour of animals with drive.

More trainers may be buying more Malinois but, with time, when the numbers are as many as the GSD they will face the same problems as we seen now.  Not every Malinois breeder will produce high drive animals.  Malinois at this time are flavour of the month so to speak.

The problem is a shared responsiblity between breeders and trainers for reasons that I have already outlined in earler posts.

regards

Mackenzie

by Christopher Smith on 12 April 2009 - 08:04

More trainers may be buying more Malinois but, with time, when the numbers are as many as the GSD they will face the same problems as we seen now.  Not every Malinois breeder will produce high drive animals.  Malinois at this time are flavour of the month so to speak.

 

When does a “flavor of the Month” simply become the new flavor? I have been hearing this “flavor of the month” stuff for the last 20 years and during that time the Malinois has continued to become more popular. The Malinois has already been down the path the GSD is taking. There have also been several splits of working Malinois people.  Remember it’s an older breed. The show versus working line debate has been finished in the breed for decades. Much of the Malinois success of today is rooted in the turmoil of the past. The problem with the GSD is the SV and it’s silly breeding rules. It’s that simple. Too much control over the breed has been placed in the hands of too few. I don’t think that the Malinois will suffer the same fate as the GSD. Yes there will always be horrible breeders that produce bad dogs. But the Malinois lacks one huge controlling influence (SV) like the GSD. If one national club screws things up they can’t take the whole breed with it.


by Christopher Smith on 12 April 2009 - 08:04

Since many people here like to bring up the Malinois on this GSD board I thought I will start throwing in a few facts that some of you may not know.

 

·         The standard for both the GSD and the Malinois call for dogs of the same height.

·         The Malinois is an older breed of dog than the GSD.

·         Malinois is not really a breed. It’s a variety of the Belgian Shepherd. Technically calling the Malinois a breed is the same as calling a sable GSD a breed.

·         The first police dogs in the US were Belgian Shepherds.

·         Three US presidents have owned Belgian Shepherds- all Malinois.


by Mackenzie on 12 April 2009 - 09:04

Hello Chris

I accept everything that you have said about the Malinois and my comment "flavour on the month" came from the fact that so much reference is made about the breed on this board in this post and other posts.

I do not think that the SV rules are "silly".   The SV set out the basic requirements for breeding but they do not say to each of it's members you must mate your female with such and such a dog, or, a particular family line.  The choice of breeding partners is left to each and every member.   Waiting for dogs to mature to a reasonable level (2 years) is sensible because the breeder will have some idea of direction when selecting a partner for their dog.  The requirement of Sch H1 is very basic in terms of work, however, it does demonstrate that the animal has learning power and can work to a minimum level (provided it is an authentic Sch H1).   Not every dog can reach the utmost heights in it's working career, even a Malinois.  The hips and elbow requirement is obvious.

The SV has many faults but it does have a system.   The best system to fail is to have no system at all.  The SV provides a considerable amount of information which, if used properly, is of great assistance to breeders.   However, the human failing comes into play in either, not understanding the information, not knowing where to get the information, ignoring the information, or just following the leader.   When Hermann Martin was President many people followed him, quite blindly, in my opinion.  I do not understand why senior judges at their meeting gave such little resistance to his methods.   In achieving the type of animals that we see today, in my opinion, the sacrifices were too great.   Work drive being one of them.

The biggest problem for the SV is not it's system but the lack of enforcement when the rules have been broken (false pedigrees, bought Sch h qualifications etc) and the out and out corruption at the highest levels.

regards

Mackenzie


by Gustav on 12 April 2009 - 12:04

Chris and Mac, I think that both of you make some good points, but in the big picture I think Chris's assessments dissects the problem the best. When you make the statement that showlines are closer to the standard than workinglines....then I see where the "BIG " picture is not understood to my way of thinking. The "standard" is comprised of the physical and "mental" aspects of the dog that have been developed to create a superb working dog. The purebred dog was created for a purpose, the standard was created so that people keep the physical and mental aspects of this dog uniform to be "able" to continue to be a working dog. Trainers, rather they are pet or top end, use the end product to help this dog become the specific working dog it was created to be. Even if this is just pet training, still they use the end product to create something. The big picture is a suprb working dog...this is why the expression the "beauty of the dog is the utility"....in this regard major organizations in the world regulating the German Shepherd have to be accountable for why the malinois is seen to be a better functional working dog than the GS these days. Most working practitioners of dogs today would no longer agree that the SL structure is good working structure anymore, (including German police academies), so the whole concept that the showlines are closer to the standard than workinglines is faulty. Many people missed Chris's point about the Mali and the GS are supposed to be the same height...so why the wide difference in agility, speed, and overall working ability with the showlines who are supposed to be closer to the standard.....Hint, Hint:...it isn't just the mental aspect, its also the physical aspect which is "supposed " to give the SL their credibility. No, I think many miss the big picture but I think Chris sees it very clearly....not to say that everybody isn't committed to "trying" to improve the breed...Ahhhh but the big picture is so ever elusive!!JMO





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top