
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Slamdunc on 20 July 2009 - 21:07
Yes, we teach weapon retention in the academy, it's a mandatory skill to learn and master. But as Mike Tyson said once in a interview "everyone has a plan until they get hit." Sam, when was the last time you were in a real fight? When was the last time you fought a guy who was 20 years old, 6', 200 lbs and high on coke? Just your average dope dealer, oh yea and who wanted to kill you.
Here's the bottom line, the cop did a great job and won the fight. He went home alive and that's what it is all about. The cop never gave up and kept his witts about him. He was able to draw a back up weapon and shoot and kill the criminal. Good day for the cop.
The dog engaged and gave the cop time to retrieve his back up weapon. His duty weapon jammed and is no doubt why the pos didn't shoot and kill him. As far as the dog goes it has been stated it was a drug dog not a patrol dog. I guarantee the dog engaged harder than the vast majority of the GSD's that people own on this forum. Your house pets believe it not, will probably not engage a guy like this even PPD or SchH trained ones. It is a 1 in a thousand dog that will. Many people are deluded into thinking their dog could do a better job than this dog did at engaging a violent subject. I beg to differ.
I would expect a patrol dog to engage the subject and fight ferociously. Any K9 cop will tell you until the dog has it's first real bite and fight with a bad guy you're really not 100% sure how the dog will react. I'm fortunate that my first day on the street with my dog we got an apprehension and a bite and I got into a fight a short time later with a dope dealer after a pursuit and the dog got his second bite. I am pretty confident my dog will bite and hold on if I go hands on with some one and I expect that from him.
I think we need to stop critiquing the video, especially since only part of it is posted. Both the dog and cop did exactly what they needed to do.
Jim

by GreenEarthK9 on 20 July 2009 - 23:07
by 1doggie2 on 21 July 2009 - 01:07
I would like to ask a question, you state that to be a good dog he has to be aggressive. Do you think you can have the best of both worlds, or is that asking for an accident? I am not talking of a sch dog (sport). I have been around sch and know the arguments for it. However, my daughter has a female that has spent time on the field and when she moved has not had time to go back. I have been watching her with keen interest. She is constructed funny, but perfect hips and elbows. Her temperment is aloof, she is relaxing a little as she gets older (she is a little over 2) and she has socialized the heck out of her, but lets her be social on her terms, never forced. There is no doubt in my mind she would fight and dirty. Her and my female got into it, she was smart about it, she only went for the major veins on my female, neck and under arms. the vet said was a good thing mine was a coat because she did not waste a bite, she would have bled out. Because, Of the situations we find ourselves in, on occassions, I am thinking not to have her finished in SCH. My line of thinking is it may take away the "dirty" fighter in her and she is such a tiny one with a will of Iron.
by 1doggie2 on 21 July 2009 - 01:07
by Sam Spade on 21 July 2009 - 14:07
Jim
Geez, so do I, so did I and I still do. I don't care what the guy tries to do, my main interest is to retain my weapon.
And a 6' 200 pound cocaine addict at 20? Wow that is the fattest 20 year old coke addict I have ever heard of. Also, the officer should have a bit of adreneline pumping with his life on the line.
I'm not trying to be a jerk because you're right. My point was that if anyone was to be scrutinized, it is the officer, not the dog.
Every supermodel just increased their dosage of coke after reading your post , Jim. They thought it was a foolproof way not to get fat.
By the way, I'm actually not lazy. I'm busy. I spend a good amount of time at the gym so I don't wind up on youtube looking like this.

by Slamdunc on 21 July 2009 - 16:07
And a 6' 200 pound cocaine addict at 20? Wow that is the fattest 20 year old coke addict I have ever heard of. Also, the officer should have a bit of adreneline pumping with his life on the line.
I actually said High on coke, not coke addict.. I don't know where you are from, but I deal with plenty of young guys who use and sell crack that are not a bag of bones. I've arrested 300 lb, 23 year old crack dealers who also used. Not every crack head is missing their teeth and skinny as a rail. There are a lot of factors, like length of use, amount of daily use and general health. You don't become a walking skeleton overnight.
My point was that if anyone was to be scrutinized, it is the officer, not the dog.
I disagree here. If anyone is to be scrutinized it should be the subject that decided to resist arrest and tried to kill the cop. The guy was told he was under arrest and made decisions that sent the whole thing into motion. As much as I dislike the OP's twisted posting of this video, it is typical for him to post things inaccurately. I'm glad he did post this. Videos like this are a good wake up call. I think I might go out and buy a small back up weapon for my ankle. That cop could have easily have been fighting with the other 3 or 4 guys that were there as well.
One thing that is evident from the video and I always stress to new officers is to call for back up; before the shit hits the fan because you never know when it will.
FWIW,
Jim
by Sam Spade on 21 July 2009 - 18:07
by Uglydog on 21 July 2009 - 21:07
You say 'Needed to do'
They were lucky. You know it. I know it.
The gun jammed. Had it not...dead cop.
The Dog was weak. Probably not well trained but genetically it belongs doing S&R or culled.
All dogs should be dual trained for the reasons shown in the vid.
Had the gun worked or not had operator error (safety?), you have a dead cop.
Had 1 or more of his buddies joined in..dead cop.
Lots of what ifs and you throw up excuses.
Procedure was rotten. Lucky cop.

by Slamdunc on 21 July 2009 - 21:07
Excuses????
The Dog was weak. Probably not well trained but genetically it belongs doing S&R or culled.
All dogs should be dual trained for the reasons shown in the vid.
Culled??? It is obvious time after time that you know absolutely nothing about temperament, working ability or GSD's in general. All Police dogs do not need to cross trained for patrol and narcotics. There are pros and cons to doing it and it is a decision that the PD K9 unit makes. I am not going to debate the issue with you, it would be a waste of my time.
As usual you are just being irritating, I suppose you can't help yourself.

by DDR-DSH on 21 July 2009 - 22:07
Sorry I've been offline and not following this thread, but I'm in the middle of a bunch of stuff right now and don't have a lot of time.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top