This is a placeholder text
Group text
by yellowrose of Texas on 20 June 2007 - 09:06
The second picture is the one I was speaking of I think that is a very bad pic I dont like the way the rear is tucked and looks roached....doesnt even look like the same dog as the first pic you linked,,,,,,,
by yellowrose of Texas on 20 June 2007 - 09:06
Sueincc: Those are two different dogs one is grey sable and one red and one is 15 mos and one is 16mos.....second pic is the one I was not liking .........
by Silbersee on 20 June 2007 - 13:06
Yellowrose,
what am I supposed to comment on? The structure of these two dogs? I will pass on that. IMO, it is not appropriate to critique anybody's dog on an open forum, unless the owner asks for it. However, if you wish to have my private opinion, please send an email.
Regards, Chris
by sueincc on 20 June 2007 - 15:06
In any case, I like the looks of the dogs. It's the stacking in the 2nd picture that makes him look like that.
by Ceph on 20 June 2007 - 17:06
I think Yellowrose was just saying that they were two different dogs...they were posted on the same date by the same poster but are different ages so they probably come from different litters from one kennel or they are two dogs being trained by one guy or some such.
~Cate
by sueincc on 20 June 2007 - 17:06
Im responding to the question regarding the conformation of the dog in the 2nd picture (even though she didn't ask me!).
by yellowrose of Texas on 20 June 2007 - 17:06
Right Sueincc ,, I thought a little too much roach on the second pic.....They do seem to be two different dogs color is different and age is too,,,,first pic has straighter back could be the way the second is stacked.......
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top