
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mystere on 27 August 2010 - 21:08

by Diane Jessup on 28 August 2010 - 03:08
Sueincc, "provocative"? Uhm. I enjoy a good discussion on the finer points of dog behavior, especially concerning the sports I enjoy. Sorry if you find that provocative. Not sure why you do.
THANK YOU to those who were able to discuss the topic without the usual sidetrack to gossip and nonsense!
The barrage in ring IS very intimidating, and there can be no doubt it puts considerable pressure onthe dog. Here is where I see schutzhund putting at least as much pressure (when done WELL) as ring (when done well). It takes more wonton to bite closer to the head of your prey/antagonist than the extremity. THis is pretty well played out by cur dogs on the street who ONLY have the nerve to grip the ankle - the point FURTHESTfrom the head, or "where the person lives". Now kids can get bit onthe face by a cur, because they press in, and the dog lashes out, but I'm talking about where a dog runs out and makes its own decision to bite. OBVIOUSLY a dog which attacks frontally, and up high, isbolder than a dog who runs infrom behind and grabs as far from body mass as possible.
This is not a reflection on the bravery of ring dogs, as they are TRAINED to take this kind of bite. But, having said that, taking numerous "escape" bites on the rear end of a ring decoy is not pressure. Having to come up high, and even being carried with front feet (or all feet on smaller dogs) off the ground puts thedog ina very pressure situation.
I have a question for folks more experienced in ring than I: what are the requirements for the decoy to move INTO the dog? Are there any? This is once the dog is on the sleeve.

by Diane Jessup on 28 August 2010 - 03:08

by Changer on 28 August 2010 - 03:08
I think we need more contributions from people who've actually done or are doing both? Anyone? Anyone?
In my very short ring experience, the decoy tends to move lateral to the dog in an effort to esquive. Much less pressure than the courage test where if done properly the helper is running straight on at the dog, hopefully without a target till the last jump. There are more bites in ring, but the dog can actually come off the bite for a substancial period of time and still pass a ring 3. That is instant disqualification in Schutzhund.
My standard answer to anyone trying to say one is better than the other is that they are different. They select for different dogs and different strengths in dogs. I've seen dogs who couldn't get a BH do quite well in ring, and vice versa.
And oh, don't forget that tracking that is 1/3rd of Schutzhund..... We might want to specify this discussion being about ring protection and Schutzhund protection. If it's about the whole of both sports, don't forget about the extra mental stress that tracking puts on both the dog and the training method....
Reiki likes them both.

by Changer on 28 August 2010 - 03:08

by sueincc on 28 August 2010 - 14:08
"you see videos of shepherds and mals coming off becuase the decoy stepped on their toe, or twisted their ankle: these can be examples of high flying, hard biting "bring it" dogs, but animals which can't "take it". "
So where are these videos of all these high flying hard biting Malis and GSDs that come off because their toes were stepped on?

by MAINLYMAX on 28 August 2010 - 15:08
I think these are the people who have done both,
Phil....,Malindobe,....Waleed....Max....Mark....
There is no question In my mind NVBK is the hardest.
But I grew up with respect for the Protection phase of scHh, and
still see it as a builder.
We now have American Judge for NVBK so you my be able to see what I mean in
the future.
As a handler in ScHh you need only worry about the event as a canned program
to pass your dog.
In Ringsport and especially Belgium Ringsport the Judge and Decoy are in
collusion to bring out what ever weakness your dog has. It is much more
dynamic, and difficult to pass. It may take you the same time to put a Ring 1 or Cat3
that it takes to put on a ScHh 3.

by malndobe on 28 August 2010 - 15:08
It takes more wonton to bite closer to the head of your prey/antagonist than the extremity. THis is pretty well played out by cur dogs on the street who ONLY have the nerve to grip the ankle - the point FURTHESTfrom the head, or "where the person lives". Now kids can get bit onthe face by a cur, because they press in, and the dog lashes out, but I'm talking about where a dog runs out and makes its own decision to bite. OBVIOUSLY a dog which attacks frontally, and up high, isbolder than a dog who runs infrom behind and grabs as far from body mass as possible.
This is not a reflection on the bravery of ring dogs, as they are TRAINED to take this kind of bite. But, having said that, taking numerous "escape" bites on the rear end of a ring decoy is not pressure. Having to come up high, and even being carried with front feet (or all feet on smaller dogs) off the ground puts thedog ina very pressure situation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We will have to agree to disagree. In Ring, when a dog has problems in the bitework, the first thing people consider doing is moving them from the legs up into the chest. If there was less pressure there, that wouldn't be the area the dog would be getting moved to. I've seen many dogs over the years who wouldn't stick a leg bite, but would stick an upper bicep bite, and eventually, after a lot of training, building, etc were able to be moved into the legs and stay there also.
A decoys is more limited in how much pressure they can put on an upper body dog, not less. Their ability to come down over the dog, effectively hit the dog, use their hands, etc is much more limited.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a question for folks more experienced in ring than I: what are the requirements for the decoy to move INTO the dog? Are there any? This is once the dog is on the sleeve.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no requirement, the decoy work in Ring isn't choreographed like Schutzhund. The decoy can do whatever he feels is going to put the most pressure on the dog, wether that's a charge or something else is up to the decoy's individual style.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we need more contributions from people who've actually done or are doing both? Anyone? Anyone?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have done both, and still am
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In my very short ring experience, the decoy tends to move lateral to the dog in an effort to esquive. Much less pressure than the courage test where if done properly the helper is running straight on at the dog, hopefully without a target till the last jump.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the esquive is to take away the dogs forward momentum, and set the dog up so it has to turn around and face a decoy who has set up a barrage and is coming at them. It takes less courage for a dog to blast through a barrage, threat, etc when it's got 40-50 meters of speed built up coming down a field then it does when the dog turns around and it's right there, no time to build up speed.
----------------------------------------------

by Prager on 28 August 2010 - 17:08
The problem boils down to : Prey compared to defense ( based on courage) bite. Just about any sport today promotes prey driven dogs without ability to "take it" in name of safety and gentleness. Here is my pet peeve. Dog's characteristics are result of the culture. I remember that during driving of a dog in SchH and ZVV dogs got really and with some pain hit with bamboo sticks. In today world of politically correct, touchy feely, safety oriented, by animal rights activists over brimming world, this is impossible.
During these methods the dog was truly tested for courage "under fire" or as you call it if he could "take it".
Now the decoy is waving padded stick above the dog and slaps him without any pain.
That is a fact of life and that is why as somebody here aptly called it "grip sport" is damaging the breed.
Please do not read anything into what I am saying here. It is just a comment on training and type of dogs now and then.
Prager Hans
http://www.alpinek9.com
by duke1965 on 28 August 2010 - 18:08
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top