NONE - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 02:09

Service dogs...........I hope that list excludes police dogs that are biting as part of their job - duh!


I imagine they are also excluding a poodle-doo mix......numbers would be too low to bother with......

VonIsengard

by VonIsengard on 17 September 2009 - 02:09

I'll wager I've personally trained more pits than anyone on this thread, and while a bad pit is a very serious dog to contend with, the same could be said of many other breeds, especially gamey dogs with high prey drive. I've met just as many cream puff pits as I have prey monster pits. As I look over the scars on my hands and arms that I have accumulated, I see: chocolate lab, malinois, boxer, lhasa apso, GSD, cairn terrier....not one from a pit.  I have had more trouble with dog aggression from them than human aggression, by far.

I find this list to be quite accurate!

fortheloveofthedogblog.com/news-updates/the-most-aggressive-dog-breeds-dachshund-1



by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 02:09

Small dogs bite more, but the bites don't tend to be as bad......

I've met just as many cream puff pits as I have prey monster pits.

I will not own another......not worth the risk for me.

by mking on 17 September 2009 - 03:09

Sitasmom- Here is the CDC and AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) take on breed specific bites: Now read it nice and slow to comprehend! DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CDC AND AVMA:
“OUR RESEARCH DOES NOT SUPPORT BREED
SPECIFIC LEGISLATION.”
Almost every proponent of discriminatory, breed specific legislation relies on one ten
year old study to make their case1. Both the Centers for Disease Control and the
American Veterinary Medical Association have warned that the findings of that study are
not an argument for breed legislation of any kind.
Why debate what the experts have already concluded?
THERE IS NO SCIENTIFICALLY VALID EVIDENCE AND NO REASONABLE
ARGUMENT TO SUPPORT BREED SPECIFIC LEGISLATION.
For a better alternative to breed-specific policies, the CDC recommends “a community approach
to dog bite prevention” from the American Veterinary Medical Association.
(AVMA) Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interactions
(http://www.avma.org/public_health/dogbite/dogbite.pdf)
_______________________
1 ("Breeds of Dogs Involved in Fatal Human Attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998" JAVMA Vol. 217,
2000)
“If anyone says one dog is more likely to kill - unless
there's a study out there that I haven't seen - that's not
based on scientific data."
Julie Gilchrist/MD, Centers for Disease Control
Co-Author, JAVMA Special Report
“[The study] does not identify specific breeds that
are most likely to bite or kill, and thus is not
appropriate for policy-making decisions related to
the topic… There is currently no accurate way to
identify the number of dogs of a particular breed,
and consequently no measure to determine which
breeds are more likely to bite or kill.”
- Centers for Disease Control Statement
“In contrast to what has been reported in the news
media, the data....CANNOT be used to infer any
breed-specific risk for dog bite fatalities…”
- AVMA Statement
www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com

by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 03:09

Enjoy you pit...........I put mine to sleep............I will not own another.........to each their own.....

You will not convince me............I will not convince you

We will have to argee to disagree

by mking on 17 September 2009 - 03:09

Hitting head on wall- I don't own a pit! Where do you get this crap? I have 2 GSD'S, NO pits.

by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 03:09

Sorry - I am celabrating being laid off - one too many gin and tonics ------ I'm such a cheap drunk - it only took 2 and a half....

forgive me!


by RONNIERUNCO on 17 September 2009 - 03:09

JUDGE JOE BROWN HAS A CHART THAT SAYS PITTBULLS ARE KILLAS.

by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 03:09

goog e nuff for me........who the hell is judge joe brown???

by VomMarischal on 17 September 2009 - 04:09

It's too bad nobody reads that CDC report critically. For example, ALL of the reports used as evidence came from the PRESS, who we know are a tad hysterical. "Attack" means anything from scratching to beheading.  If you read the report very carefully, all the way to the end, the writers of the research clearly state that none of the evidence is empirical. It's just freaking gossip and should not be used to support BSL.

Nobody with a dog should support this kind of hysterical sensationalist crap. It only encourages politicians and insurance companies to write lists of dogs that cannot be trusted, which incidentally includes GSDs. Be careful about who you make gross generalizations about, because it's going to happen to you before too long. 

Speaking of anti dog, sensationalist crap, did you see that the instigator of the anti dog legislation in California, Mr. Gavin Newsom, is running for governor? How ya like being in the same bed with HIM, Sitasmom?

Here's my essay on the subject, should anybody be that bored....
http://www.chako.org/forum/blog.php?u=53&b=7








 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top