
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 02:09
I imagine they are also excluding a poodle-doo mix......numbers would be too low to bother with......

by VonIsengard on 17 September 2009 - 02:09
I find this list to be quite accurate!
fortheloveofthedogblog.com/news-updates/the-most-aggressive-dog-breeds-dachshund-1
by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 02:09
I've met just as many cream puff pits as I have prey monster pits.
I will not own another......not worth the risk for me.
by mking on 17 September 2009 - 03:09
CDC AND AVMA:
“OUR RESEARCH DOES NOT SUPPORT BREED
SPECIFIC LEGISLATION.”
Almost every proponent of discriminatory, breed specific legislation relies on one ten
year old study to make their case1. Both the Centers for Disease Control and the
American Veterinary Medical Association have warned that the findings of that study are
not an argument for breed legislation of any kind.
Why debate what the experts have already concluded?
THERE IS NO SCIENTIFICALLY VALID EVIDENCE AND NO REASONABLE
ARGUMENT TO SUPPORT BREED SPECIFIC LEGISLATION.
For a better alternative to breed-specific policies, the CDC recommends “a community approach
to dog bite prevention” from the American Veterinary Medical Association.
(AVMA) Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interactions
(http://www.avma.org/public_health/dogbite/dogbite.pdf)
_______________________
1 ("Breeds of Dogs Involved in Fatal Human Attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998" JAVMA Vol. 217,
2000)
“If anyone says one dog is more likely to kill - unless
there's a study out there that I haven't seen - that's not
based on scientific data."
Julie Gilchrist/MD, Centers for Disease Control
Co-Author, JAVMA Special Report
“[The study] does not identify specific breeds that
are most likely to bite or kill, and thus is not
appropriate for policy-making decisions related to
the topic… There is currently no accurate way to
identify the number of dogs of a particular breed,
and consequently no measure to determine which
breeds are more likely to bite or kill.”
- Centers for Disease Control Statement
“In contrast to what has been reported in the news
media, the data....CANNOT be used to infer any
breed-specific risk for dog bite fatalities…”
- AVMA Statement
www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com
by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 03:09
You will not convince me............I will not convince you
We will have to argee to disagree
by mking on 17 September 2009 - 03:09
by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 03:09
Sorry - I am celabrating being laid off - one too many gin and tonics ------ I'm such a cheap drunk - it only took 2 and a half....
forgive me!
by RONNIERUNCO on 17 September 2009 - 03:09
by SitasMom on 17 September 2009 - 03:09
by VomMarischal on 17 September 2009 - 04:09
Nobody with a dog should support this kind of hysterical sensationalist crap. It only encourages politicians and insurance companies to write lists of dogs that cannot be trusted, which incidentally includes GSDs. Be careful about who you make gross generalizations about, because it's going to happen to you before too long.
Speaking of anti dog, sensationalist crap, did you see that the instigator of the anti dog legislation in California, Mr. Gavin Newsom, is running for governor? How ya like being in the same bed with HIM, Sitasmom?
Here's my essay on the subject, should anybody be that bored....
http://www.chako.org/forum/blog.php?u=53&b=7
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top