
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by raymond on 01 September 2009 - 00:09
by RONNIERUNCO on 01 September 2009 - 01:09

by sueincc on 01 September 2009 - 02:09

by CrysBuck25 on 01 September 2009 - 02:09
First of all, that's just wrong. When my male Shepherd decided to hump a lady's leg, he never got the chance to do it again. I started working on reinforcing obedience training, and I got him neutered two days later. That particular, embarrassing behavior was not repeated. Why would you use that particular behavior as a reward? How would you expect to be taken seriously?
Second, unless I have forgotten some other reason, the only two reasons for hump is sex and dominance. Now, letting a dog show his or her dominance over you is not the best way to reward a dog, and letting him get frisky with you...Well, I guess there are some sick folks in this world.
The argument that compares this to a dog humping someone in a movie is a valid one. But regardless of whether we're talking movies or dog training films, the use of humping is inappropriate. The occasional accidental humping is one thing, and is natural, but training it and using it for a reward is sad. I guess if you have to let your dog have sex with your leg or dominate you, it shows who's really the boss in that relationship, and it sure isn't the two legged.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in the use of positive reinforcement for good behavior, and that includes, depending on the dog, toys, food, and verbal praise/petting. But no way will I encourage a dog to hump me as a reward for sitting, staying, or spinning in circles.
Just picture this...Schutzhund field...any part of the training...you reward your dog by letting him go to town on your leg....I think you'd get laughed off the field. That's what should happen to anyone doing this type of "REWARD" training. No excuse. A kind word, a pat on the head, a toy...That's the reward. Having a wonderful home, good meals, and vet care when they need it...That's the reward.
People who feel the need to encourage this type of behavior are a bit touched in the head, in my honest opinion, and those are the ones that make non-dog people look at dog people and shake their heads.
Sad day for dogs when pro trainers are sick people, too...
Crys

by steve1 on 01 September 2009 - 05:09
Possibly she was giving signals out unseen by humans that she was a bit intimidated by the Dog and a Dog knows that and that could well be the case with this Jean woman as well she is sending out signals to her dog but thinks she is teaching it or training it Not much chance of that, Like some others they could be doing it for there own pleasure Whatever makes them tick
Steve

by CrysBuck25 on 01 September 2009 - 06:09
From the dog's point of view..."I sit, and then I get to show her who's boss...This is the life...AHHHHH!"
If you can't train a dog in obedience or anything else without acquiesing to it's dominant demands, then you're not the pack leader, you're not the trainer. You're just the follower, and should stick with cats...
Again, just my opinion, but I'm not a fan of so-called trainers who don't believe in the whole concept of dog training. Once I have reinforced with normal, decent rewards the behavior you want, then I use corrections when the desired behavior isn't given. I don't believe in beating, or any type of abuse, but I do use tone of voice and collar corrections, as well as placing the dog back in the position it broke from.
It'll be a cold day in a very hot place before I'll be wishy washy with any creature, human or animal. We each have our place in this world, and I am at the top of the food chain when it comes to my dogs. I am fair, but strict. I cannot stand bribery to get what you want. I don't spoil (I know, I'm mean) and when I say something, I mean for it to be followed, not ignored.
"Trainers" like Jean Donaldson, Barbara Woodhouse, and that crazy woman on "It's Me or The Dog", hit my "off" button. To watch the wheedling, pleading way they try to get what they want from the dogs they "train" makes my stomach turn. You're not talking to a human, for God's sake. It's a dog, doesn't speak English, and understands concepts. Pure and simple, a dog, like a kid, needs a leader it can look up to and love, not a doting parent who thinks it can do no wrong, no matter what it does.
I have finally gotten Oakley to understand the concept of stay, and she's doing very well. She's also very good at the sit, no longer bites hands, pant legs, or human legs, and stops when I tell her no. She doesn't misbehave much except to chew on occasion, but that's because she is teeth right now, and that's something that she can't help. It's my job to see that what she chews is appropriate. She's quite obedient, and I don't even have to let her hump me!
Crys
Tell me, Steve...Wouldn't you laugh yourself into agony if you saw someone with their dog on a Schutzhund field, and the dog's reward for good behavior was good old Donaldson? I know I would! If she's fool enough to let the dog dominate, then maybe she deserves what she gets.

by steve1 on 01 September 2009 - 10:09
Crys
I do not take too much notice of these people like this Jean woman in regards Dog Training,
To me training a Pup the basic things which you require of him is easy enough, it just takes time and patience, but above all i make it as if it is playtime always playtime, then you will get the rewards from the Dog without any silly tricks
I always praise the Dog in a softer voice than i use for commands and i give it a biscuit or treat every time it does well and well as verbal praise, mind you these treats come out of its dinner later on they are not extras, for you will soon add up over the amount you feed a Pup if you do not deduct the treats and Biscuits given in training,
I have never hit any of my Dogs in all the years i have had them, i have tapped them on the nose or given it a tweak to make them understand what the pup is doing wrong, much the same as its mother would do but hit them never in this world
I am pleased that Oakley is going on well the Pup deserves it
Steve
by triodegirl on 01 September 2009 - 17:09

by VomRuiz on 01 September 2009 - 17:09
I thought most of the time humping was dominance rather than sexual....Like leg lifting (marking) "Oh good boy, you sat when I told you to! Here..Piss on my leg!" Now the dog is the boss. Absolutely WRONG as far as I'm concerned. I think I'd rather be pissed on than humped. Better to be pissed off than pissed on, literally? Not in my book
If that was a trick, that woman is weird...If that was a reward that woman needs to be mailed a box of dog treats or a ball.
Stacy

by dAWgESOME on 01 September 2009 - 18:09
"...If that was a reward that woman needs to be mailed a box of dog treats or a ball."
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you are so right. She has always been "out there" but this pushed it over the edge.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top