This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Videx on 08 June 2009 - 23:06
"much more responsible" is a phrase that comes to mind.
by jaymesie51 on 09 June 2009 - 07:06
I agree that their should be some kind of censorship and that this should be done by the panel or elected body not done by one person freedom of speech is a right in this country providing it is not lible or lies and it would be up to the elected body to decide what is acceptable and what is not, one person should never be left to decide this.
jim h
jim h
by Penny on 10 June 2009 - 10:06
Breed Concil Panel Meeting promises to be a lively one again then - Mo
by missbeeb on 10 June 2009 - 11:06
Have I got this right? There is only one member of the BC making all these decisions? If this is so... why is there a panel?
I can understand that certain things generate more work, therefore, delegation is necessary! More people aught to be recruited to take on some of the work... that's simply common sense, isn't it?
Besides, it's entirely unfair to expect Sheila to do everything... it would keep me awake nights, (if I were in her shoes) wondering what would happen if something happened to me... a silly and potentially dangerous position for the BC to put itself in... having just the one person running everything! I'm sure Sheila would welcome some assistance!
by Videx on 10 June 2009 - 11:06
Don't be so sure - POWER is an aphrodisiac to some people.
by Penny on 13 June 2009 - 11:06
I would promote the National Magazine on my website, if I was sure that people buying from my recommendation would not be privvy to personal insults and there was good information with no personal arguements and naming of people just to get ahead
In fact, I started to hand out old copies of the Mag with a subscription form with a litter of puppies last year, to get my buyers interested...... when one of the families came back to the puppy club, which goes with a sale of a puppy - they were totally amused about people feeling insulted by each other and having a go about it in the mag
I had given it with my puppy pack, telling them it was a very informative magazine for the GSD owner. It would be interesting to see if they subscribed, as they had every intention of the way I put it across. Mo - Mascani
In fact, I started to hand out old copies of the Mag with a subscription form with a litter of puppies last year, to get my buyers interested...... when one of the families came back to the puppy club, which goes with a sale of a puppy - they were totally amused about people feeling insulted by each other and having a go about it in the mag
I had given it with my puppy pack, telling them it was a very informative magazine for the GSD owner. It would be interesting to see if they subscribed, as they had every intention of the way I put it across. Mo - Mascani
by Videx on 13 June 2009 - 13:06
BC Magazine =12 per year, 4 per year, nil per year, that is the only time the editorial nonsense will stop
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top