
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Held on 20 February 2009 - 17:02
by hexe on 20 February 2009 - 18:02
You're right, my comment was a drive-by and incomplete. Sable refers to the agouti pattern of multiple color banding on single, individual hairs, not to a pattern on the overall coat.

by Mystere on 20 February 2009 - 18:02
That link was very interesting. I had never heard of a solid liver, and, frankly, I think that dog was absolutely beautiful. Not in standard, but a beauty!


by Baldursmom on 20 February 2009 - 18:02
She did not have any health problems and bite quite well. Beautiful animal, but as you said, there are not many around ~120 registered in the USA and with it being an unacceptable color, we won't see that number changing.

by MVF on 20 February 2009 - 18:02
This reminds me of Tom Wolfe's adage that sometimes "believing is seeing".

by MVF on 20 February 2009 - 18:02
If that recessive gene is a self-colored black, the sable tends to be more pronounced, and we tend to call the dog a black sable.
If that recessive gene is a B/T, then the sable gene gets expressed with much substantial tipping in all those places where the recessive gene would express black, and much less in those places where the recessive gene would express red.
NONETHELESS, I still have trouble believing the bitch in that pic is a sable! Either the photo is wrong, or somebody did it with the milkman or I am going blind. Because somebody with a sable gene got into that pedigree in that generation!

by Silbersee on 20 February 2009 - 19:02
did you see my above post? I stated that the female in question - Vienchen von Arlett is/was a sable. No milkman! She was identified by the Körmeister (breed surveyor of the SV) as a sable dog. There is nothing wrong with that pedigree because there is a clear sable line in there.
Margit van Dorssen, Vienchen's breeder is a respected judge and will come to this country on judging assignment soon. You (or anybody) can ask her directly, or just send her an email through her website www.arlett.de .

by Mystere on 20 February 2009 - 19:02
I think we all (or nearly all) agree that the bottom line is that it is always EASIER to tell what's sable and what's not from seeing the dog as a puppy and/or seeing the puppy pics. I haven't seen a gsd in the last 20+ years that looked the same as an adult as it did as a puppy, with the exception of solid blacks.

by kioanes on 20 February 2009 - 22:02
i have resisted posting, since it's my puppy's pedigree being discussed. i am posting now to give another example of a dog from a sable/ black& red mating. this dog is basically unrelated to the 9 wk puppy.
here's a pic of her as a 4 week puppy, looking very 'sable-ish'. Lots of black on her, body color somewhat mousy.
here's a link to a pic of her at 12 months ( and her pedigree)
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/pedigree/551053.html
still looks very sable, but a saddle is emerging and tan is reaching up the legs.
now she is 18 months old, and looks much like a black & red, though the sable shawl is still there and shows some sabling on the thighs. ( sorry, crappy weather = no recent pic) She may end up not looking like a sable at all.
btw, she has a sable brother and a bi-color sister.
by kioanes on 20 February 2009 - 22:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top