OT I am an American - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Uglydog on 02 September 2008 - 20:09

I read recently that Indianapolis Police Department is now done with affirmative action.


They have had their share of problems,  with lesser qualified applicants,  who turned out to be thugs on the Force committing criminal acts.

I suspect more will follow..affirmative action can be seen for what it is, a Joke. Judge someone based on merit & most qualified, not skin color.  

For many..affirmative action is now reverse racism.


by dshlerner on 02 September 2008 - 20:09

Hi Uglydog,

More often than not,the thugs on the force are white officers who not only commit a variety of criminal acts,but who also abuse,and KILL minorities! Has nothing to do with AA. With regard to it being "reverse racism" that is not at all logical,because if it were really " reverse" racism,then by definition,the perpetrators of said "reverse racism" would have to be people of color! Not rocket science. If we were to judge based on merit....true merit,alot of whites( like good ole George W.) would'nt be in the positions they are in. No one has ever claimed that people of color do not commit criminal acts,of course they do.Just like EVERYONE ELSE! It's just that when people of color do illegal things,their "race" is front and center for the discussions that follow. Interestingly,this does'nt seem to be the case for whites. I wonder why?


JustLurkin

by JustLurkin on 02 September 2008 - 20:09

LOL Uglydog.  Your screen name suits you.  I guess according to you I am now either a sheep dumbsh*t or a dumbshi*t sheep.  Not sure which.  Given the source of the namecalling I'm not sure that's all that important.

I do thank you.  You certainly made my point. I'm only sorry I didn't include (actually forgot about) the incessant self-serving photos that you constantly post with your "oh so credible" and unbiased sources with no agenda.

With that I'm done reading your posts.  In all honesty they're all but worthless. 

I do find it a great pity that you don't have the intelligence or verbal skills to debate/make your point without the name-calling.  I cured my children of that name-calling and unintelligent behavior by the second grade.

How's that canned goods and ammo gathering coming along? 

Good luck to you.

 


by Uglydog on 02 September 2008 - 20:09

dshlerner...

I dont have the stats available. But as stated. Indianaopolis discontinued Affirmative Action. It was their Black Officers that were their undoing.   I read the reports & crimes committed.

Proportionately, I will venture a guess and say that Black officers probably are involved in more Police crime but again I have no stats to prove or make a case. I dont care really.  Crime should not be tolerated & it applies to all cops, black or white.

But I do care that otherwise more qualified applicants-WHITES-are being passed over (see story below of a white candidate)  for some less qualified Black & Minority applicants ie Women & Hispanics. And that IS Reverse Discrimination by any definition. You just hate to call it what it is.

 

Police reject candidate for being too intelligent


A US man has been rejected in his bid to become a police officer for scoring too high on an intelligence test.

Robert Jordan, a 49-year-old college graduate, took an exam to join the New London police, in Connecticut, in 1996 and scored 33 points, the equivalent of an IQ of 125.

But New London police interviewed only candidates who scored 20 to 27, on the theory that those who scored too high could get bored with police work and leave soon after undergoing costly training.

Mr Jordan launched a federal lawsuit against the city, but lost.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York upheld a lower court’s decision that the city did not discriminate against Mr Jordan because the same standards were applied to everyone who took the test.

He said: “This kind of puts an official face on discrimination in America against people of a certain class. I maintain you have no more control over your basic intelligence than your eye color or your gender or anything else.”

He said he does not plan to take any further legal action and has worked as a prison guard since he took the test.

 


by Uglydog on 02 September 2008 - 20:09

Lerner...Its the tactics used I question more than skin color, but certainly revere racism is a problem, as is quotas & Reverse discrimination.

Our police forces are now trained by the Jewish ADL. And the reason they are militarized & many use thug tactics.

The ADL was formed in 1914 to protect a Jewish Pedophile murderer, Leo Frank, who confessed to the crime & was later lynched by a Mob-Southern Justice..

ADL Police training schedule across the Nation..Its lengthy

http://adl-usa.us/adl_trains_law_enforcement_list.htm

 


by dshlerner on 02 September 2008 - 21:09

Uglydog,

    That is one officer who has been "aggrieved" by a policy that did'nt serve it's intended purpose as well as it could have.
     Unfortunate? Sure,but I have a question for you.What is it called when a lower scoring white person gets a position that should have gone to a "more qualified" white person,of the same gender?

Regarding your comment that this is reverse discrimination....no . I called it EXACTLY what it is! Reverse discrimination is a false concept that entered the national lexicon(in the USA) in 1978 after the Bakke decision.....I presume you are familiar with the case?  It is again,that zero sum argument put forth by many whites whereby anytime a minority/woman gets ANYTHING,they must have "stolen" it visa-vis AA by an "inherently" more 'DESERVING" OR "QUALIFIED" white male.

So is your position,then,that everything should only be controlled by white men? Qualified,or not? Again,reference George W. Bush. Clearly not qualified for his job,but has it nonetheless.


by hodie on 02 September 2008 - 21:09

All of you must surely know you waste your good minds, thoughts and time with this UglyDog who means what he says and yes, is perhaps one of the worst offenders on this site spewing his anti-semitic hatred on practically every topic to which he posts. He is another who could contribute but is so wrapped up in one agenda he cannot read what the topic is about. He has been kicked off of other sites, and by the grace of this site having no moderators at the moment, and living indeed in a free country, he continues to spew his hatred. We have seen this before. He belongs to an era now past, one where uniforms with lightning bolts adorned a black uniform and where, when someone like him would have spoken out against the party line would have been summarily executed in the street where he stood. He is unable to comprehend his mind is poisoned. And sure, he is collecting his ammo and the cans for the next Armageddon he hopes will come soon.


steve1

by steve1 on 02 September 2008 - 22:09

After looking in on this and two other Threads on this forum i see it is no longer a forum about the noble German Shepherd Dog, but has now changed to a political forum with the usual slanging off brigade at its fore,

Its about time the owners of this site sorted some of you not so clever people out and got rid of you, you are not worthy of being on the forum, But it seems they must agree with the few because it is allowed to carry on

It is not nice to see it on a public forum where children are viewing, But i guess thse ones doing it have no feelings for the younger viewer, and must have been bought up that way

Steve


by dshlerner on 02 September 2008 - 22:09

Steve1,

You are correct! And it is sad indeed that this board has come to this; however,as someone with a social and political conscious,I cannot allow comments like his to go unchallenged,especially when they are devoid of fact,logic,and critical thinking! Thank You,however,for pointing us BACK in the right direction!

Hodie,

Right on ! As usual.

Regards


by Uglydog on 03 September 2008 - 00:09

Lerner..'False concept' my Big Behind.  You might want to Ask your doctor if Paxil is right for you..

Here is a definition for you from dictionary .com,  to help you,  as your in oblivious to Reverse Discrimination  & what the implications of it are:


reverse discrimination Definition

Reverse Discrimination Noun


'Discrimination in hiring, college admissions, etc. directed against members of certain social or racial groups, as White males, thought of as being dominant or having benefited from past discrimination against minority groups who are now favored, often as a result of affirmative action.'

 

Whites passed over for lesser whites?  How about Favoritism or Nepotism.  Thats what I call it, because that is what it is.   I abhor it as well as reverse discrination we see practiced now in many agencies & Companies, Quotas to make things 'fair" as diversity is our strength.. Press 1 for English, Senor.

To  the others-Steve, Hodie...I stand with honest people for justice , like the Pictured Jews above who protest an Apartheid State in Israel who run a Concentration Camp in Gaza.    Jews like Professor Norman Finklestein, Bobby Fisher, Jack Bernstein, Rabbi Weiss, Benjamin Freedman. 

Its an OT, & if you cant handle an adult conversation or contribute  intelligently to the dialogue, just make an exit. Hodie, Im the only one who brought facts to this post.  

 

 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top