Are these two females breed worthy? - Page 3

Yes well they plop down big dollars for their well bred dogs and super nice fields, kennels and training I'm sure. Not to mention the best dog food, help and showing the dogs. I wont mention the every day stuff like vet bills,shots, worming....

If I had big bucks I would do the same at this level. It's my hobby, my love but I do what I can, with what I have. I'm sure that is what they are doing. It's OK to be jealous. I envy them too.

I am not saying they are or they aren't a puppy mill. And I am not bashing anyone. I was only stating that it struck me wrong to put a puppy on a future breeding page. It would come across a lot better to put it on a young dogs page. When you put a puppy down as a definate future breeding dog it does leave a bad taste in a lot of people's mouths. To say you have young dogs from a National Universal Siegerin that you hope will be breedworthy is one thing. To put them on a public website as future beeding females is a whole different thing. Especially when the majority of your other females are untitled it makes it seem like there isn't much criteria for breeding. That is just how it struck me.

the picture is Asko vd Luter - he's ugly but he is proven to produce excellent for working - not sure how excellent his progeny's structures have been - but for working, absolutely.

molly

golden elk

the pic I posted is a male :))

BWHAHAHAHA!

I swear to God I was thinking "boy" but typed "girl" because the thread is about two girlsl. I'm not that much of a newbie, LOL!

exactly Molly.  The point I was making with the pic is that not always judge a book by it's cover :)) Asko Lutter is a living ledgend :) and right fully so :))

HEY - Asko isn't THAT ugly and he has one heck of a tail too!!!  I'm kidding, I'm a big fan, I've got a grandson.

Ok, what makes him ugly?

Barb

ok I agree he does have a pretty tail :)

A VERY pretty FLUFFY tail.

ugly or not he did receive a KKL1 :)) 

Pia