
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Felloffher on 26 June 2012 - 00:06
It wont' come as a suprise my goal is to breed working dogs. My philosophy on breeding is fairly simple (not that producing the perfect dog is), to start there are two things I won't compromise on when selecting dogs for breeding or for future breeding.
I will not make any exceptions after giving a dog or pup a fair adjustment period if they display any signs of fear or shyness in situations such as crowds, traffic, strange surfaces, dark buildings to name a few or if a dog has any sensitivity to sounds like gunfire, thunder or any other noises for that matter. This means truly challanging the dog with new situations, not a set routine the dog or pup will get used to and honestly evaluating the dogs performance. I think using this criteria alone would wash many dogs currently being used for breeding.
IMO the only way to achieve my goal is to start will solid stock and try to make small improvements in subsequent generations, rather than trying to breed dogs that are severly deficient to begin with. This also means working the dogs and constantly evaluating them. Breeders should be their own worst critic when it comes to selecting dogs from their own program and should have the balls to wash a dog regardless of the amount of time spent raising and training them.
Time will tell, but I believe I'm off to a good start.
by Blitzen on 26 June 2012 - 00:06
Great goals, Felloffher. Good luck with your breeding program. I'm with you as far as proofing dogs prior to using them for breeding. I try to do that too in my own way.

by Felloffher on 26 June 2012 - 01:06
You have to realize your golden middle is only seen from the perspective of people in your camp. You've taken a working line and altered it's confirmation to suit the needs of the AKC show ring. Let's be honest, your ASL could have been bred to my wife's Min Pin and it would have improved working ability. You really haven't achieved anything as significant as you would like us to believe. It's all smoke and mirrors, a cheap sales pitch in an attempt to lure buyer your way. Hopefully most educated buyers can see through the BS.

by Felloffher on 26 June 2012 - 01:06
I like what I'm seeing so far, but I will measure success based on what I produce in the next couple of generations.

by vonissk on 26 June 2012 - 02:06
Blitzen while ago I had a brain fart and said give Barb a hug and I know it was Bev............DUH. Thanks for the encouragement and I hope we do real well too on Friday. I was interested in this topic and then in hollering at you and Gustav. But now it's time to go again. Arguing with closed minds and trying to just get them to open their eyes a little is useless. Later gater.......
by Blitzen on 26 June 2012 - 02:06
Her goals may not be your goals, but it's really not fair to suggest that her motives are less than noble because she breeds for a dog that can work in different venues and compete in the show ring. I do the same thing and it's probably not any easier than training a competitive sport dog.
by Ibrahim on 26 June 2012 - 07:06
I have seen a dog bred by Fellofher in a recent thread, very nice in conformation and shows very good drives and bite work, if all what he breeds are near to the conformation of that dog, I personally appreciate what he's producing.
I think all what Fellofher says about temperament, drives and work ability is the truth, only thing he jumps over the conformation, " moderate angulations", what is that term?
Angulations are set and defined and are part of what GSD should be like, extremes in drives and extremes in angulations is not what the standard calls for, therefore I see Vonissk is closer to the standard than others and her golden middle is what versatile means. I think it was (Gustav) but pardon me if I am mistaken, who once said that from a good breeding there will be some puppies good as pets, some good for police, some for SAR etc.
Is a breeding where most puppies are excellent for sport a good breeding!!!!! just wondering
Ibrahim
by Blitzen on 26 June 2012 - 12:06

by Sunsilver on 26 June 2012 - 12:06
I saw a wonderful documentary on Dogs With Jobs last night, about a GSd who was trained to do SAR. His handler is a woman, who's no longer young. She looked like she was pushing 60. They worked quakes in both Mexico and Turkey, and the dog, Petro, had live finds in both quakes, as well as indicating the location of numerous bodies. In Mexico, he kept insisting there was someone alive down there, even 10 days after the quake. His handler listened to him, and they eventually found two women, still alive, buried in the rubble.
So, what's so interesting about that? Just a good GSD doing his job, right?
Well, yes, except Petro is obviously an American show line.
Take the goddamn blinders off, will you? You claim to like working dogs, but I'm quite sure you wouldn't even give this one a second glance!
by Blitzen on 26 June 2012 - 12:06
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top