
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Carlin on 14 July 2013 - 16:07
by joanro on 14 July 2013 - 16:07

by Keith Grossman on 14 July 2013 - 16:07

by Carlin on 14 July 2013 - 16:07
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where Zimmerman screwed up, which caused the death of an unarmed teenager walking back from the store to his uncle's (?) house.
If Martin chose to assault Zimmerman, then it was Martin's actions which ultimately caused the shooting.

by Keith Grossman on 14 July 2013 - 16:07
Of course but why would Martin have done so? I'm sure Martin saw other people and cars on his way to and back from the store; why would he decide that it was a good idea to suddenly attack one of them without provocation? It simply doesn't make sense.

by Carlin on 14 July 2013 - 17:07

by Mindhunt on 14 July 2013 - 17:07
Instead of embracing the richness that differences bring, so many times it is used in a negative divisive manner. Racism, sexism, ageism, bias against sexual orientation, bias against different religious or spiritual beliefs, bias against those with lower SES, bias against any belief that is uncomfortable or different from others exists. How to we address this so that future generations are not asking the same questions????

by Carlin on 14 July 2013 - 18:07
Well, I can tell you that from listening to NPR this morning, for instance, these emotional and polarizing forces were working overtime, and the many baseless and reactionary presuppositions that were being made immediately following the verdict were propagated and inflamed by irresponsible journalists and media outlets. Everyone comes to the table with an opinion, but it's incumbent upon justice to put those to rest before deliberation. Yet, I hear words being casually thrown about such as "tragedy of justice", as if the court of public opinion, whose verdicts were reached long before the real trial even began, simply must reflect some kind of inerrant knowledge based on what has to be a form of supreme omniscience. What a freakin' comedy. ACLU? Really? You never really know what people are thinking or are motivated by, but Zimmerman to me doesn't exactly embody the picture of the WASP. Then, to assert somehow that the entire process and system was choreographed according to race? Talk about losing sight of the forest for the trees.Racism, sexism, ageism, bias against sexual orientation, bias against different religious or spiritual beliefs, bias against those with lower SES, bias against any belief that is uncomfortable or different from others exists. How to we address this so that future generations are not asking the same questions????

by BabyEagle4U on 14 July 2013 - 18:07
Were Zimmerman a cop, no doubt he'd have immunities with what went down, without so much as a newspaper article.
NOTHING is good about this case for people willing to take responsibility for their own defense. This is nothing more than a hit piece on the SYG Law and a promotion on racism.
I don't remember all the riot's or riot talk spewed by the MSM during and after the OJ trial.
The only reason that Alexander didn't get the stand your ground was because she left the house to get her gun from her car - then went back to fire the warning shots. Now, that Alexander was a wacked out person to begin with - but 20 years for warning shots ?
Zimmerman sought after that boy - put himself in that position to kill ok, there was NO stand your ground about it !!!
It's a mockery of SYG Law, self defense and our Justice system.
Obama should file a federal charge with the DOJ on that Zimmerman if you care to know what I think. We can't have wannabe cop Zimmermans running around - stalking and killing people with nothing more than skittles and a drink in their hands. I prolly would have beat his head in the ground too.

by Carlin on 14 July 2013 - 18:07
That is quite an assumption, and it may be true, unfortunately. You simply cannot go around carrying a firearm with the intention of asserting your will. That does not make this murder.Zimmerman sought after that boy - put himself in that position to kill ok, there was NO stand your ground about it !!!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top