This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Blitzen on 20 December 2006 - 19:12
Correction: canine-genetics.com site
Sorry for the typo.
by Shelley Strohl on 22 December 2006 - 01:12
Well-researched, hard-studied outcrosses. Not TOO far out, or you destroy whatever desireable consistency you have worked so hard to achieve.
by jletcher18 on 22 December 2006 - 03:12
maybe its because we are talking about dogs and not humans. would you marry your 3rd cousin once removed and have children? maybe you would if there was no genetic defects (HD) ,a high IQ (trainability), a desire to succeed (nice drive) , and you would still produce humans (correct structure) to be gained.
IMO (as always)
by Shelley Strohl on 22 December 2006 - 17:12
jletcher18-
I think you just described why I never had any children.
LOL
by Blitzen on 22 December 2006 - 17:12
ROFL....and why I shouldn't have.
by jletcher18 on 22 December 2006 - 19:12
you may be able to guess that my wife and i dont have any either, unless you count the ones with 4 legs, there are 8 of them :)
by jdh on 25 December 2006 - 22:12
The mating check on this site can be quite usefull for bringing up the linebreeding on a particular breeding. The general rule in linebreeding is to use close up linebreeding to a few desireable ancestors of compatible phenotype that is carried foreward by the breeding pair. Avoid multiple vague 4th and 5th generation linebreeding as it has little or no benefit, and contributes to the overall linebreeding depression. While we have a considerable bottleneck at the moment, there remain many excellent alternative lines. Best wishes,Jonah
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top