This is a placeholder text
Group text
by GSDfan on 19 November 2006 - 14:11
by spook101 on 19 November 2006 - 14:11
by eichenluft on 19 November 2006 - 14:11
by funk man on 19 November 2006 - 16:11
by hodie on 19 November 2006 - 16:11
by VOTAN on 19 November 2006 - 17:11
by ALPHAPUP on 19 November 2006 - 18:11
by Norman on 19 November 2006 - 18:11
by allaboutthedawgs on 19 November 2006 - 19:11
Ok, please don't anyone chamber a round and cock the trigger because I am just trying to understand not start an argument.
I don't know how to do that thing where you copy part of someone else's post and respond to it so I'm going to paraphrase. Somebody said breeders often want to breed a female at a BH level to see how she produces. But, how can that be ok when it's the common consensus that breeding untitled dogs puts a litter of puppies out there with the traits of a dam who has not been tested under pressure? HONESTLY I just want to understand not criticize.
The other question is: if the dam only has the disposition, drives or whatever term is appropriate to test further than a Sch1; and if people say there are working faults in both show and working line(either too soft or too hard); then wouldn't it help if all the females would go to a Sch3 before breeding? Wouldn't that be a step toward reducing the gap between show and working lines?
Keep in mind I have never done Sch and my knowledge is from reading and internet. But, it seems like a Sch3 is supposed to weed out the dogs that are crazed or fearful. Maybe my lack of actual experience with it makes me have too shallow an understanding of the reality or philosophy of the sport.
And, yeah, I really hope I didn't step on a landmine here.
Dawg
by DesertRangers on 19 November 2006 - 19:11
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top