
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by mollyandjack on 26 June 2012 - 16:06
If we could see the teeth better and a top view of the skull, it would be easier to identify. Do they have other pics and/or the approximate size of the animal?

by GSDguy08 on 26 June 2012 - 16:06
Just that pic, but I think cage may be right. Look at the skull on the side in the picture......see the bone sticking out like it is oddly........Look at this picture, exact same thing.......and it's a wolverine skull. http://www.boneroom.com/casts/images_bc/mammal_wolverine.jpg

by k9gsd78 on 26 June 2012 - 16:06
Wolverines don't have that long of a skull, nor do they have that many molars.
http://www.dinosaurcorporation.com/wolverine.html
On second look, the molars are too pointed for a bear. Looking more like a wolf.
http://www.dinosaurcorporation.com/wolfskull.html
Hard to tell how big the animal is.
http://www.dinosaurcorporation.com/wolverine.html
On second look, the molars are too pointed for a bear. Looking more like a wolf.
http://www.dinosaurcorporation.com/wolfskull.html
Hard to tell how big the animal is.

by Sunsilver on 26 June 2012 - 17:06
How large is it? It definitely looks like a cat to me. The snout is too short to be a bear.
Edit: okay, after consulting my Mammalian Osteo-Archaeology book, it's the skull of a raccoon. Teeth are the most important thing in identifying remains, and the last two teeth in the lower jaw are flattened. If this were a true carnivore such as a cat or a wolverine, they would be sharp, like a dog's carnassials. the large teeth used to shear through meat and crunch bones.
The skull in the picture looks slightly different because it's from a juvenile raccoon, and the growth plates aren't fully closed yet.
I spent close to a year examiing and identifying animal bones for a university course I was taking, so I'm pretty sure of my I.D.


Edit: okay, after consulting my Mammalian Osteo-Archaeology book, it's the skull of a raccoon. Teeth are the most important thing in identifying remains, and the last two teeth in the lower jaw are flattened. If this were a true carnivore such as a cat or a wolverine, they would be sharp, like a dog's carnassials. the large teeth used to shear through meat and crunch bones.
The skull in the picture looks slightly different because it's from a juvenile raccoon, and the growth plates aren't fully closed yet.
I spent close to a year examiing and identifying animal bones for a university course I was taking, so I'm pretty sure of my I.D.


by Lennard on 26 June 2012 - 17:06
Would help if we knew what Country???
by beetree on 26 June 2012 - 17:06
USA, Indiana, OP said. (waves@Lennard!)
I'm going with raccoon, too, after a comparison with Ss's picture-link. Besides, it does make the most sense, being how common they are in the USA. I rather was hoping it was a youngish, maned-lion, but that's just the dreamer in me!
I'm going with raccoon, too, after a comparison with Ss's picture-link. Besides, it does make the most sense, being how common they are in the USA. I rather was hoping it was a youngish, maned-lion, but that's just the dreamer in me!


by Ninja181 on 26 June 2012 - 18:06
by Rass on 26 June 2012 - 18:06
What really throws you off in a "guess this" photo is the lack of anything to indicate scale.
I looked at a few skulls and Raccoon is the one that seems most similar.. the molars and the curved jaw are the giveaway.
I looked at a few skulls and Raccoon is the one that seems most similar.. the molars and the curved jaw are the giveaway.

by Sunsilver on 26 June 2012 - 19:06
Speaking of shooting, I used to have the skull of a female raccoon. If you looked closely, you could see the cause of death was an overdose of lead...there were two shotgun pellets embedded in it.
I lost the skull when I took it to Comparative Anatomy class one day, then later left it behind in the cafeteria. (No, I didn't accidentally give one of the cafeteria staff heart failure: it was in a paper bag, and the staff would have just assumed it was someone's lunch leftovers, and chucked it out.) : ( If I'd still had it, I would have recognized the animal in that photo right away.
My professor said it was from a female, because the front surface of the canines was worn completely smooth and shiny. The females click the upper canines against the lower to communicate with their kits.
I lost the skull when I took it to Comparative Anatomy class one day, then later left it behind in the cafeteria. (No, I didn't accidentally give one of the cafeteria staff heart failure: it was in a paper bag, and the staff would have just assumed it was someone's lunch leftovers, and chucked it out.) : ( If I'd still had it, I would have recognized the animal in that photo right away.
My professor said it was from a female, because the front surface of the canines was worn completely smooth and shiny. The females click the upper canines against the lower to communicate with their kits.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top