
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Elkoorr on 11 April 2010 - 17:04

by ShelleyR on 11 April 2010 - 18:04
JMO
S

by cphudson on 12 April 2010 - 21:04

by yoshy on 13 April 2010 - 00:04
Elkorr i agree with the sleeve tight but i think its just the angle makeing it look like he has the stick in the bite zone. This is also a reason why i like PSA so much more than, schh. decoys intentionally shove stuff in the dogs mouth, obstruct the bite zone, fight the dog, put much more real pressure on them. So you see things like this much more often because it pushes the dog to preform a little more.
cp hudson this doesnt look to me like play. ears down, tail tucked so far up his butt its touching his chest confused frantic behavior. I Beleive he got ran legitimately. I would like to see a few more seconds on the ends of that clip though.
I dont get how this can be passed off as decoy error or dog playing. Protection is meant to be to test a dog to protect or apprehend. This dog should not be ran for any reason i dont care if the decoy was hitting him he better engage him. The fact that he was- shows 1 of two things. insufficient training and or poor genetics. one of the two or both. The only reason I would accept from my own dog is severe injury. such as a ripped out k9 or something. which could be what happened who knows. However this dog obviously showed a vital flaw and showed that in a real protection scenario it has a big percentage of possible failure.
----
Only things i would nail a decoy on is flinching/turning early, jamming the dogs, or inconsistant working of dogs in same scenarios.

by Rugers Guru on 13 April 2010 - 03:04
I agree 100%! Its the reason I like FR, and PSA as well.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top