
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GSDPACK on 06 September 2010 - 21:09
I went by the CMKU and Suchno and for some reason I was under the impression that the rules are the same..I was wrong.
Pack

by Liesjers on 07 September 2010 - 00:09
by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 01:09
Mackenzie"
Interesting quote from Karl Fueller regarding his VA 3 Xitta vom Kirschental that is in a similar vein:
" 'Xitta' was a pure working dog with the sheep, when I presented her for the first time at the HZS, where she achieved V4 in the GHKL. At the evaluation, quote the Bundeszuchtwart, Hermman Martin: " I would have placed this dog VA, had she also had a SchH title, not just the HGH." Thereupon, I had Edzard Müller train "Xitta" through SchH3 IPO3 FH. The following year, "Xitta" achieved VA3."
Also if I recall correctly, there was a dog from one of the Danish kennels a few years ago that had been all but given a final place in the VAs when it was discovered in the judges tent that the dog's dam was not breed surveyed, and the dog was moved back to V 1.

by GSDPACK on 07 September 2010 - 01:09
As I said I was mistaken. A dog bred under the rules in Czech Republic, Slovakia will not have papers unless the parents are both breed worthy under the rules.
That is why only titled and Bredsurveyed dogs go to breeding program. Unless it changed over the last 10 years. I believePrager would know or some other people from my country.
If dog is not breed worthy, the puppies will NOT have papers..
that is why I deducted that no papers, no show... so logicaly no show rating unles you attempt "oroskiadu-vorsikiadu" where compete dogs without papers but it is more for fun sine the competition is against any type breed, cross breed.
I was just mistaken and my deductions were based on non relevant knowkledge. I like slovakian system because unless both the parents are proven.. NO PAPERS.. in some peoples' views: Mutts.. you can compete in NZR but not n high level utside of the country since there is no proof of pedigree...
That is all, I didn't mean to creade another debate.. I was just wrong and I was corrected and educated.. now I know more
P

by Liesjers on 07 September 2010 - 01:09
by SitasMom on 07 September 2010 - 17:09
hell of a mother dog, proves that an old dog can learn new tricks
9 and after at least a few litters, the dam was able to title, pretty cool,

by raymond on 07 September 2010 - 17:09

by Ruger1 on 07 September 2010 - 18:09
Thanks for the posts...my question has been answered...

by july9000 on 08 September 2010 - 12:09
" 'Xitta' was a pure working dog with the sheep, when I presented her for the first time at the HZS, where she achieved V4 in the GHKL. At the evaluation, quote the Bundeszuchtwart, Hermman Martin: " I would have placed this dog VA, had she also had a SchH title, not just the HGH." Thereupon, I had Edzard Müller train "Xitta" through SchH3 IPO3 FH. The following year, "Xitta" achieved VA3."
Funny...I thought a HGH was a working title..why did he ask for Sch?? HGH is supose to be as good as a SCH. title no??
by Donald Deluxe on 08 September 2010 - 14:09
It is for a breed survey or a V show rating, but apparently not for a VA at the Sieger Show.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top