GSD fraud? - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 04 May 2010 - 17:05

I know Beetree and when I have done it, people come out of the woodwork to jump on me. So believe me I know and I am still waiting on the public apology Michael49.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 04 May 2010 - 17:05

Maggie Man,

Lets put it out for a vote like a democratic community would. Their are a lot of people here who don't like me so you might have a chance.

If I win you go and if you win I go, no signing up or using other users. Come on Maggie all your supporters can then vote and we will see after all their are a lot of people hear who don't like me. So unless you want to do more chicken dancing put up or shut up.

Mystere

by Mystere on 04 May 2010 - 17:05

quote by Michael:  "Mystere, I have to disagree with you here, akc will at some point want the money, and the more breeders the more money.I don't think Tina will maintain that control in the end, what would prevent akc from accepting them into the registry."


You are absolutely right--AKC has never seen a breed it would not recognize, if it could make money off it.   However, the threshold number to go for AKC recognition is relatively low (please see the Podengo issue, or check www.falconk9.com regarding the podengo pequeno activities for recognition).   Given that, it is apparent that Tina could have sought AKC recognition some time ago, had that actually been a goal.  There is  Tina's Shiloh registry and at least one other  Shiloh registry (actually two or three of them) and I doubt that registration is free for any of them.  Somebody is getting those filing fees.   One of the other Shiloh registries may be actively preparing to seek AKC recognition, but apparently Tina is not. 
Also, I believe you are involved in schutzhund, Michael?  So, you  know that "some" dog folks are really into control, e.g., some megla-maniac TDs.

Mystere

by Mystere on 04 May 2010 - 17:05

I vote for Sock Puppet.

by michael49 on 04 May 2010 - 17:05

Sock Puppet, If I felt I owed you an apology, I'd be more then glad to give you one, so far I haven't seen you say anything about the Shiloh one way or another, try giving an opinion about the post instead of the posters and I might consider it.It seems like you want to play search and destroy with me now,so good luck with that.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 04 May 2010 - 18:05

I did you fool but your Maggie free speech fighter had it deleted. Keep talking Mikey.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 04 May 2010 - 18:05

No Mike,

I have nothing against you but when one troll keeps starting crap over and over with some of the most knowledgable people here I have a problem with that, so being it is a free country I can do the same with him and cause him all kinds of shit.

I have/or had nothing but respect for you but to call me out on the snob thread, if you were a man of your word, then you would have been on some dog related thread instead you took the time to try and call me out. Why?

by michael49 on 04 May 2010 - 18:05

Sock Puppet, So now you resort to calling me a fool,sorry I can't give you credit for being a fool,but I think I would be overating you, you now have your desired apology.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 04 May 2010 - 18:05

Michael49,

You are the one who came on the snob thread to call me out and then you turn around and do the same thing. You need to live up to what you say. Like I said I respect your opinion so I guess I am the fool here even though you took the time out of your dog talk to call me out and then set their and keep poking fun at what was happening.

Michael49 I am sorry I came to a thread and out of the blue called you out.


MaggieMae

by MaggieMae on 04 May 2010 - 18:05

It's Sue.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top