
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by crhuerta on 03 March 2010 - 17:03

We have that WDA & UScA problem too........but we have dogs that are owned by people from each organization..?!
We can't NOT support the owners of the dogs......we need to go.
Well as long as we "ALL" get together as much as possible...it'll be fun.....stressful...but fun.
Robin

by Liesjers on 03 March 2010 - 18:03

by Keith Grossman on 03 March 2010 - 18:03
"Also I am no longer a USA member, something about being a WDA member, in a WDA club, photography for WDA...doesn't look good for me I guess, lol."
If you're a couple, couldn't one of you belong to the WDA and the other belong to USA? For that matter, does the rule state that the owner of a dog has to be a member or only the person entering the dog? What's to stop people from paying someone else to enter their dog(s)? LMAO! Wouldn't that gripe their ass..if everyone figured out ways to circumvent their rule so that the only end effect was a drop in membership dues.
by crhuerta on 03 March 2010 - 18:03
We co-own dogs......so....one has kept their UScA membership.....one has kept their WDA membership.....a COMPLETE pain in the ass!
But until "something" changes,,,,that looks to be the only solution for some co-owned dog owners.
Robin

by Liesjers on 03 March 2010 - 20:03

by Keith Grossman on 03 March 2010 - 20:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top