
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by VonIsengard on 09 April 2009 - 14:04

Shelley's first sentence was spot on. Gotta rushrushrush to get that title and make them babies, those bills dont pay themselves!
Mackenzie, it's a heartfelt post, and I agree with most of it, but this topic and been beaten so badly I'm tempted to make a Rihanna joke. I've said it before, I'll say it again: the perspective on showline dogs will NEVER CHANGE until more showline owners start pushing their dog and themselves into sport and having success there. I have a laundry list of exceptional showline dogs I know who are on par with working line dogs, but no one ever seems to care, and thats ok. Actions speak louder than words. I hope to see you and your SL dog a national field some day, Mackenzie.
sueincc: my first SchH dog is WG SL, and I had 0 problem titling her. Then again, in her prime, she put a smile on WL people's face's. Sometimes she still does.

by sueincc on 09 April 2009 - 15:04
Yes that is a big problem, Shelley, I agree. KC, yes I know, there are some good ones out there. I honestly feel that when someone does stick it out with that show line pup they learn invaluable lessons about drive building, and training in general. Still though, from what I have seen, most of those few people who do decide to stick it out, and those who want a dog they can be competitive with, their "next" prospect is from working lines. It's not all about the trainers, the dogs must have the drives.
Here is video of the dog ScHBabe mentioned in her post. This is part C from 2008 WUSV. Score 80 points. This is putting together a very successful trainer with a show line dog. Of course, this might not be representative of this particular dog, since it is just one video. It is the only video of him doing part C that I could find. That said, to my eye, the dog just doesn't quite have "it". Also, I wonder if even the conformation of the show lines does not inhibit the dogs in this work? For example, the front leg movement is so animated at a run. I know this is what creates the beautiful trotting but Is this part of why they do not exhibit the same speed or coordination at a run? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7A3a8C4xMGM&feature=related
I actually don't have a problem with their being a difference between working line dogs and show line dogs. I think some people will always place more emphasis on sport and some will place more emphasis on show conformation. I do wish there wasn't such a great divide between the two. I really admire those breeders who keep an eye on both sides. I believe show line dogs should be able to do the work, though I would not expect them to be able to do it to the degree working line dogs can. By the same token, I believe working line breeders need to pay attention to conformation, but not to the extent the conformation interferes with the dogs ability to work.
I guess my long winded round about "point" is no, it is not simply a matter of the dogs not being schooled properly and it's not just because they are rushed through training, though that is never a good thing. Both sides have things that need to be improved. I just don't think both sides need to be the same.
by Held on 09 April 2009 - 16:04
You want to better the breed then stop breeding dogs for show and start breeding for the working drive first before anything else.
lot of puppies are born each year ,majority go to pet homes why because there are not enough people doing sport or show , too much politics and bull shit and stupidness,too much time.
big trainers do not want to compete with show dogs there are lot of reasons for this.why Ivan competed with a show line makes no sence.i think he was trying to prove something and failed,not that i care what Ivan does or does not do,but here is a guy who is competeing with Malies all the time and then jumps to a show line shepherd he should go to a strong shepherd first from a working line. have a nice one.

by Mystere on 09 April 2009 - 16:04
Those who train are aware of the importance of early imprinting foundation work. Mess that up, and you could be doomed. No training is often (if not always) better than bad training.
I have seen at least one SL dog that had more to him that SL are given credit for. His owner did place him in the hands of an experienced trainer and competitor several years ago, while dreaming of the Universal Sieger title. Unfortunately, though, that drive early on to get the titles on the dog by the time he is 2 1/2, so he can be bred hand over fist (no pun intended) meant that the early foundation work was deficient. No one can completely overcome a rotten foundation and simply bad training on a 4 or 5 year old dog. Under pressure, a dog reverts to its genetics ...and the foundation. If either, or both, is deficient, the later performance is always going to be affected to one degree, or another.
Sue,
I have seen the dog you are referencing more than just at the WUSV. I have seen him "close up and personal" several times. WYSIWYG. This is with one of the top trainers and competitors in the sport. But, he did not raise that dog from a puppy and put on all the early foundation work, either. IMO, that made a huge difference.

by ShelleyR on 09 April 2009 - 16:04
If the dog is good enough to win big, a lot of big name trainers don't give a crap what its lines are.
SS

by Mystere on 09 April 2009 - 17:04

by ShelleyR on 09 April 2009 - 18:04
SS

by Sunsilver on 09 April 2009 - 18:04
Just wanted to thank you for starting it.
It's threads like this that keep me from leaving when things get a little too nutty on her!


by lancegfx on 09 April 2009 - 18:04
With Frei in 3 can we call Jasko a "pure showline dog"?haha imagine a future siegerschau with black dog like Bomber Wolfsheim or Onyx silbersee as VA like Frei in the past.These are my boys, they don't know what line are they supposed to be so I just call them my GSD.


by ShelleyR on 09 April 2009 - 18:04
Wore a hole in my carpet trying.
SS
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top