Service dogs - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

TIG

by TIG on 13 February 2009 - 11:02

Jennifer can't tell from your post what the purpose is. Are you merely curious or would like to learn to train service dogs or are you envious of those "passing off "  their dogs as service dogs and wish to be able to do the same. So please let us which of these it is.  May I suggest to be very very careful in evaluating certification schemes.   The Internet abounds with fraudulent offers to certify assistance dogs much akin to the mail in minister's "certifications" i.e. you have the money, I have a printer and I'll send you out a printed piece of paper.

Next you need to be aware that the issue of psychiatric service dogs is somewhat of a hot button right now. Unfortunately many of the dogs being claimed as service dogs are no more than a "comfort" or therapy dog - neither of which have public access rights and neither of which are service dogs. These dogs are often derogatorily referred to as "feel good dogs" - i.e. the dog makes me feel good so ergo he's a service animal. Unfortunately very wrong!

You need to educate your self about assistance dogs (guide,hearing,service) and what their legal status is and the rights their owner (not the dog) has to public access.   Most importantly beware that there are several thresholds that must be met.  Firstly the owner must be disabled and this is defined by the law as having adisabling condition which must be severe enough to substantially limit one or more major life activities, such as the ability to see or hear, speak, breathe, learn, work, think or take care of oneself. Secondly the  dog must be individually  trained to do work or perform tasks which serve to mitigate the disabling condition. Please note here that a business owner has the legal right to ask what tasks the dog is trained for. Finally the dog must be well behaved and under control. Business owners and other representatives of places of public accommodation have the legal right to exclude any dog who displays aggressive behavior or is out of control. They may also exclude any dog whose behavior disrupts the provision of goods or services, such as a dog barking in a movie theater.

The above info comes from a site I suggest you explore www.iaadp.com. These pages have information on task training in regards to the ADA and also information on task training of psychariatric service dogs. http://www.iaadp.org/A-dogWorld.html  http://www.iaadp.org/iaadp-minimum-training-standards-for-public-access.html  http://www.iaadp.org/tasks.html  and http://www.iaadp.org/psd_tasks.html . It is very important on this last page that you pay attention to the disclaimers as the author tries to delinate the difference between mere trained obedience behaviors(ie a long down) and a task trained to mitigate the disability. It is often much more problematic delinating such tasks for a psychiatric condition than a physical one. It is important to know that mere "grounding" of the person by their presence is NOT legally considered to be a task trained to mitigate the disability. Hope this helps.


TIG

by TIG on 13 February 2009 - 11:02

Jennifer can't tell from your post what the purpose is. Are you merely curious or would like to learn to train service dogs or are you envious of those "passing off "  their dogs as service dogs and wish to be able to do the same. So please let us which of these it is.  May I suggest to be very very careful in evaluating certification schemes.   The Internet abounds with fraudulent offers to certify assistance dogs much akin to the mail in minister's "certifications" i.e. you have the money, I have a printer and I'll send you out a printed piece of paper.

Next you need to be aware that the issue of psychiatric service dogs is somewhat of a hot button right now. Unfortunately many of the dogs being claimed as service dogs are no more than a "comfort" or therapy dog - neither of which have public access rights and neither of which are service dogs. These dogs are often derogatorily referred to as "feel good dogs" - i.e. the dog makes me feel good so ergo he's a service animal. Unfortunately very wrong!

You need to educate your self about assistance dogs (guide,hearing,service) and what their legal status is and the rights their owner (not the dog) has to public access.   Most importantly beware that there are several thresholds that must be met.  Firstly the owner must be disabled and this is defined by the law as having adisabling condition which must be severe enough to substantially limit one or more major life activities, such as the ability to see or hear, speak, breathe, learn, work, think or take care of oneself. Secondly the  dog must be individually  trained to do work or perform tasks which serve to mitigate the disabling condition. Please note here that a business owner has the legal right to ask what tasks the dog is trained for. Finally the dog must be well behaved and under control. Business owners and other representatives of places of public accommodation have the legal right to exclude any dog who displays aggressive behavior or is out of control. They may also exclude any dog whose behavior disrupts the provision of goods or services, such as a dog barking in a movie theater.

The above info comes from a site I suggest you explore www.iaadp.com. These pages have information on task training in regards to the ADA and also information on task training of psychariatric service dogs. http://www.iaadp.org/A-dogWorld.html  http://www.iaadp.org/iaadp-minimum-training-standards-for-public-access.html  http://www.iaadp.org/tasks.html  and http://www.iaadp.org/psd_tasks.html . It is very important on this last page that you pay attention to the disclaimers as the author tries to delinate the difference between mere trained obedience behaviors(ie a long down) and a task trained to mitigate the disability. It is often much more problematic delinating such tasks for a psychiatric condition than a physical one. It is important to know that mere "grounding" of the person by their presence is NOT legally considered to be a task trained to mitigate the disability. Hope this helps.


justcurious

by justcurious on 14 February 2009 - 00:02

just happened across this article and thought of this thread - hth
http://www.geocities.com/vinnie_norberg/ServiceDogsAutistic.html

by Orchardhof on 14 February 2009 - 10:02

Those are very interesting links!

Terri

TIG

by TIG on 14 February 2009 - 10:02

The link given by Justcurious is a fine example  of bunk and bs. Please show me where on that page it elucidates a single TASK that the dog is trained for that allievates the disability. That is the definition of an assistance dog. Assistance dog is the term used in the ADA when outlining access rights. Assistant dogs encompass guide, hearing and service dogs. As I noted above the fact that the mere presence of the dog or simply interaction with the dog ( often called grounding) alleviates or stabilizes the persons emotions does not meet the standard of a task trained dog that is required to be a service dog. Dogs functioning as described on that website are nothing more than companion animals that are "comfort" dogs.

It is the like of these that place in jeopardy the hard fought for public access rights for those of us partnered with true service dogs.

Another area that is ripe with marketeers out to make a buck off the disabled is the marketing of "seizure alert" dogs. Note carefully - seizure alert dogs can NOT be trained because we do not yet know what they are alerting off of. It may be scent, it may be facial or body changes  or it may be subtle electrical signals we have no way of detecting at this point. True seizure alert dogs are rare and they are not trained - they came to the skill on their own. If you notice the dog is alerting you can reinforce that but first you need a dog that figured it out on his own. All too often however  what happens is the owner has a seizure then thinks back and decides Pooky had been doing xyz and that was meant to indicate that she/he was going to have a seizure. So then every time they see Pooky doing xyz they pop a pill to prevent a seizure and ergo do not have one and become convinced in their mind that the dog had alerted to an impending seizure when in fact there is no proof of that whatsoever. It is what dog trainers call a superstitious behavior - meaning the dog has accidently chained a response to a stimulous that had nothing to do with that behavior. So anyone out there hawking "seizure alert' dogs is a scam artist and once again puts in jeopardy the rights of those partnered with real assistance dogs.

What can be trained is a "seizure response" dog where the dog is taught one or more set behaviors ( tasks) in response to the actual seizure. For example retrieve the phone and push a button or buttons that are preprogrammed to dial 911 or to go get another person in the household.

If you are interested in this area, please read the links going to the IAADP pages which show examples of tasks that can be trained to mitigate disabilites. Please do not believe every Tom, Dick and Harry website you come across.

justcurious

by justcurious on 14 February 2009 - 15:02

TIG - do you yourself have an assistance dog, what sort? do you train assistance dogs? if so any particular area of focus? i'm sorry the link bothered you so much but i thought it was interesting to read about an austistic person's perspective on training a dog for their own needs. no marketing of anything - at least if there was i missed it - just a link to a support group. 

many people with disabilities either are too poor and can't afford to have someone train their dog for them, or are in situations that disqualifies them from receiving a trained
dog from an organization, so they are left on their own to fill the need.  if someone can train their own dog and improve the quality of an autistic person's life (or any other disability) then that's a good thing in my book.  but the real intent behind sharing the link is imo since most people who will be training assisitance dogs do not themselves need an assistance dog reading an interview with someone who utilizes one might just help them develop a program that fulfills an unmet need.

ilovemypoodlefluffy

by ilovemypoodlefluffy on 14 February 2009 - 22:02

i sent my info and dog's picture to the service animal registry of america for bandit who was my psychiactric service dog i trained myself. found thru web search for service animal certification. even with so called certification many in the public refuse to believe these dogs are necessary and make it a point to continually harass the disabled individual. i hate confrontation and finally gave up. my dogs helped my anxiety so much but it just wasn't worth it in the end to be constantly defending my right to have my dog with me. now i leave my dogs at home and brave it the best i can. i was training fluffy to help my daughter with mild autism, and that's why i had 2 dogs with sometimes.
i haven't had either dog in vest with me anywhere for several months and was walking around one day when a guy came up to me smiling, stuck out his hand and said hi i'm jay. what's your name. i looked at his hand without taking it (germophobic) and said uhhhh.....amanda. he said it's so nice to meet you. hey aren't you the one that goes walking around with those dogs? i said yes. he said and don't you have them as companion animals too?  i said uhhhh........    i was not sure what to say since i don't really bring them out anymore except as just dogs. he said, well sometimes you do, and IT'S NOT LEGAL.  SO KNOCK IT OFF, YOU HEAR ME!  then he walked away laughing to himself.
there was a time in my life i could not even go outside by myself but i have made myself get over it. i prefer to be invisible in a crowd to the constant ridicule i was getting. i trained for tasks listed at www.iaadp.com.
good luck.

www.freewebs.com/serviceanimals may assist with certification too.




Casa del Mango

by Casa del Mango on 14 February 2009 - 23:02

The Delta Society has guidelines and Public Access Test information. You can have a trainer certify that your dog has passed a PAT. I always recommend advanced training and titling, as well.
There is no "certification" for Service Dogs, technically, though a dog used for Psychiatric Support or Emotional Support, the handler needs a letter or prescription from a Mental Health professional current for that calendar year. A Psych Support dog (PSA) has all the rights of a regular SD, an Emotional Support Dog (ESA) is really more like a glorified pet and can travel places pets can't (like on airplanes or live in public housing that normally does not allow dogs).
There is no letter needed for an Assistance Dog to mitigate physical disabilities.
The biggest issues are people abusing the law and passing off their pets as SDs, PSA/ESAs. I am handicapped and have trained my dog to assist me, and it is upsetting to have stewardesses tell me they are "so surprised" my dog is well-behaved as the dogs they are used to are so awful... the least people can do is train their dog to behave appropriately. Though the dog is SUPPOSED to be a piece of equipment, in fact, we are really ambassadors... and if (really, when) someone finally gets "caught" abusing the law - it IS a Federal Offense...

TIG

by TIG on 15 February 2009 - 11:02

Justcurious  I have posted many times re Remy my service dog http://www.allk-9.com/sontausen/remy.htm. My friend Julia puppy raised her from 3 mo to 11 mo and put foundation work into her including a retrieve which is for me one of the most important aspects of her service work. The rest of her training both for service work and sport has been done by me and as anyone with an assistant dog will tell you training and reinforcement never ends. In her Schutzhund tracking she free tracks and retrieves the articles to keep consistent with her service dog work. I am also currently raising and training her daughter to ultimately be my successor dog. Not that any of this gives any more legitamacy to my comments above as they were  based on the law not personal opinion or experience.

"i thought it was interesting to read about an austistic person's perspective on training a dog for their own needs." You  seemed to have missed the whole point of my post. If you read this page there is very little training going and certainly no task training which is what would qualify the dog to be considered a service dog. A Service dog performs tasks which mitigate the disability ( for ex Remy retrieves dropped objects and can help with balance support and help me up if I fall). This is a requirement of the law not something I made up. Once again I ask you to point out the tasks this supposed Autistic service dog is trained for. They are merely using the dog as an emotional sink. That is a companion animal or a "comfort dog" or a therapy dog - NONE of which are service dogs and NONE of which have public access rights.

"wh no marketing of anything - at least if there was i missed it -" "
real intent behind sharing the link is imo since most people who will be training assisitance dogs do not themselves need an assistance dog reading an interview with someone who utilizes one might just help them develop a program that fulfills an unmet need."   She hawks herself as a trainer of service dogs which I find disturbing because she clearly does not understand what one is and once again she is NOT utilizing one because the actions she describes do NOT meet the legal standard  for a service dog.

A pesky thing, the law and it's requirements and perhaps I am more attuned to the requirements because of my background (lawyer by training and law librarian for the last 20 years). The reality is however our rights to use assistant dogs and have public access is a delicate balance between the accomodation of our disabilities in a manner we choose with the rights, needs, cultural attitudes, fears etc of the rest of society. It is an educational process each day as noted above and yes I get angry when I see people who do not pay attention to what the law demands and grants because ultimately that puts at risk what we have worked so hard and long to get.

TIG

by TIG on 15 February 2009 - 11:02

Casa, One suggestion and two corrections if I may. You stated "A Psych Support dog (PSA) has all the rights of a regular SD, " I would suggest you might want to change the phrase to - A Psych Support dog (PSA) as long as if has been task trained as required by the law, has all the rights .... because as noted above this is a burgeoning area of concern because people are calling mere comfort dogs PSA and they do not understand or choose to ignore the requirements for task training.

The first correction I would like to make is reqarding what you chose to call an ESA. There is no such creature. Dogs being so labeled are merely companion animals acting as comfort dogs. Accurate labeling and language is always very important when dealing with any civil right issue. The problem w/ the label ESA is it gives the impression to the uneducated that these are trained dogs or dogs that have legal rights neither of which is true. I strongly recommend we call a spade a spade and label them the mere comfort dogs they are.
 
Secondly, while you are right that HUD specifically grants rights to comfort dogs in HUD housing , you are wrong about them being able to travel on airplanes like a SD. The new air transport regulations about to go into effect which control air travel and are separate and different from the ADA, have been revised to clarify the language in the regs that perhaps led to this mistaken assumption. The new regs specifically reject public access rights on airplanes for comfort dogs because they do not meet the legal standard for an assistance dog. ( it also clarifies that pythons, pigs and the like do not meet this standard either. )Yes unfortunately there was a case about a claimed "service" python that they wanted loose in the plane with them.  This was yet again one of the "feel good" situations, i.e. it makes me feel good so I should have some sort of rights to take it with me. Once again that does meet the legal definition of a assistance animal.
 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top