
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by habanaro on 28 January 2009 - 23:01
Again the AWD titles have the attack on handler included in them, At present any USA judge can do an AWD title.
Jeff G
by Bob McKown on 29 January 2009 - 17:01
by SitasMom on 29 January 2009 - 17:01
(environmental) green on the outside and (communist) red on the inside
they can all go to h-ll!
the working dog test should be exactly as it was when Max was still alive..........his breed, his standard, his test.........

by habanaro on 29 January 2009 - 18:01
The AWD 2 has the attack on the handler during the back transport from a second helper.
on the awd 3 it's similar to the IPO 3 but with a differnt emphasis on scoring.
by Bob McKown on 29 January 2009 - 18:01
Thats good to know Jeff thanks for that info, looks like i may have to change my trialing plans

by habanaro on 29 January 2009 - 18:01
by Bob McKown on 29 January 2009 - 18:01
I don,t mind the obedience I,m just not thrilled by some of the mechanical obedience i see (personnel preference) I just despise the dumbing down of the Schutzhund protection as of late history.
by Christopher Smith on 29 January 2009 - 18:01
Why is USCA even brought up in this? They have NOTHING to do with the rules for schutzhund! The rules for schutzhund are set by the AZG in Germany. If there is a rule change to the sport they are the only ones to do it. And trust me USCA has zero influence on them. This is the reason that we should be doing IPO and AWD in the US, IMO.
If you want to see a wall back in a schutzhund type sport your best bet is through the AWDF/AWD, if you live in the US. If the AWDF breed clubs push for it it will happen. I believe the AWMA would be on board in a heartbeat.
You can also get a Mondioring obedience title now and that would have the wall.

by habanaro on 29 January 2009 - 18:01
by Bob McKown on 29 January 2009 - 19:01
Hey jeff:
You know i love you like a brother but is your hair cut crooked or is the right side of your head larger then your left in the photo or is it all mirrors and a illusion?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top