
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Two Moons on 08 January 2008 - 14:01
Do you pay a stud fee if nothing is produced? If my dog and the other dog both have history of good production and nothing is produced somebody didnt do the mating correctly. I know there can be other reason, but do you still pay for a service not recieved?

by Two Moons on 08 January 2008 - 15:01
Ilse???? you have issues. sort of people.
by eichenluft on 08 January 2008 - 15:01
Usually the stud fee is paid for services rendered - ie the breeding takes place. If the female doesn't take, then the breeding is repeated no additional charge - some stud dog owners limit the "repeat breedings" but personally I don't - the stud fee pays for a litter of puppies, no matter how many times the female doesn't conceive.
molly

by senta on 08 January 2008 - 15:01

by Sunsilver on 08 January 2008 - 15:01
It's such a poor photo that it could be almost any two dogs of similar colour. It proves nothing...to may eyes, you really can't see enough detail to know for sure they are tied, and not just posed butt to butt. Why not take GOOD pictures in full daylight of bitch and sire seperately, to show off their conformation.
Makes NO sense to me at all! I don't find it vulgar, just totally pointless.
I can understand reasons given above: taking a picture to send to the bitch's owner as proof of mating, but other than that, why bother?
by Blitzen on 08 January 2008 - 15:01
Maybe photos of dogs copulating are aphrodisiacs to some people?

by Two Moons on 08 January 2008 - 15:01
thanks eichenluft
dna is yes a very good tool, also testing could be expensive if you had to get legal on someones arse.
I think knowing your breeder is first the most useful thing of all.
Now, how bought those horse pictures MI_GSD? Rock our world! LMAO!!
Just kidding ...............:)

by MI_GSD on 08 January 2008 - 16:01
LOL Those even scare me.

by yellowrose of Texas on 08 January 2008 - 17:01
I take pics of the tie also as to answer any question of unbelief but I would never post it on a public forum.....this picture in in an ad on the database here......not a very good use of judgement and is not needed to be posted....
If someone wants a pup from the two ,,,dna is now the correct way to prove the sireship...but send the person a picture of this mating by mail or email.....just not necessary to use it to sell your litter....not a very good pose to tell me how nice your two dogs look...in this pic they look stupid...and of ill structure...why would I want a pup that looked like either one of those....in this picture..... ill way to advertise...

by KYLE on 08 January 2008 - 17:01
Oh my goodness is there nothing that is not an Issue! How uptight are you!? This is animal husbandry. This is to prove that the the tie occurred between the two dogs. How repressed can you possibly be? Get over yourself. Your proboably into lights out and covers up. As far as photoshop goes, yeah its possible to fake it. But most people that question someones integrity may have an issue about their own. What more is a breeder to do? DNA will come back on a pup and you can take it from there. This picture was about tradition and proof of a breeding, nothing more, nothing less. Keep your pent up, adolesence, moral majority insecurity to yourself.
Kyle
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top