bio-engineering; synthetic DNA, that replicates - a bit scarey - Page 14

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by beetree on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

Sorry, your words, not mine. No deal.

I don't care if I dont exist to you. You spout crap here, I will say what I will. You have no say about it. 


by vk4gsd on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

What a snake.

by beetree on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

LOL, see what I mean... blame it all on EVE! 


by beetree on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

Anthem for vk4


gouda

by gouda on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

VK4  YES I DO HAVE A RESPONDS TO YOUR POST.

The yeast thing bothers me,my dog hates it to when it infects her ears.

  John  {gouda}

Have a nice evening ,I sure am


by vk4gsd on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

Haha well i will stay above you and leave yr relatives out of the conversation even if you think that's ok.

sure learning a lot about xtianity here.


by beetree on 10 April 2014 - 01:04

We learn a lot about people, period. Including you. You leave a trail that is reeking a mile long.


ggturner

by ggturner on 10 April 2014 - 03:04

Thanks for your support bee.  

 


Shtal

by Shtal on 10 April 2014 - 06:04

sevenpatch wrote: What exactly are you expecting to observe?  Are you capable of observing the precise moment when a child becomes an adult?  If you can make such a determination, what are you basing your determination on?

You see science is self-corrective, I happened to like science but you see “creation view” does not have to be “constant corrected” because its right; okay, and what you said of course we don’t see changes, farmers has been raising dogs, you know 4,000 thousands years and we don’t see changes because it takes too long…if you don’t see faith in their I can’t help you; okay, you are relying on unseen, oh yes long ago and far away, evolution is got to be biggest fairytale for an adults ever created, everything you said required faith, what we see dogs produce dog but if you give them billions of years…well, okay, you just left science and went to religion and didn’t even see it. You didn’t even see what happened in your mind, you jump from “science to faith” back and forth all the time. Well we see dogs produce dogs but if we have enough time; stop, stop and stop; you are leaving science right on that moment.

 

sevenpatch wrote: Such evolution does not require a spontaneous increase in genetic information, although we already know that increases in genetic information do happen.  Why do you think spontaneous increase in genetic information is necessary?  How exactly are you determining what is possible and what is impossible?

What we evolved into new species? Nothing ever evolved into any new species, I hate to use the word species, and nothing ever evolves into new kind. Nobody ever observed anything change into different kind; bacteria are still bacteria, if they become resistant to a drug is because they lost the locking mechanism on the ribosomes so that about they can’t lock-on, is no different than somebody handcuff everybody and sending them off to jail to kill them - but you don’t have any arms, so they can’t handcuff you, so you survive, wow beneficial mutation, well it might be for the moment but it’s NOT any new information, bacteria don’t evolved into something else, they loose information, they are resistant to a particular drug for a short time but then when you put them back into population a regular bacteria and they are inferior. Bacteria are still bacteria for heaven sake; that is not example of evolution.


by vk4gsd on 10 April 2014 - 06:04

shtal you are in denial, pure and simple. it is sad your barin is corrupted.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top