
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Teufel Hunde on 08 December 2012 - 00:12
Maybe you didn't see this line????????? It was in the opening paragraph. Two members of the club have vom Eisenherz dogs and I support both 100%. I like and respect both. If they feel otherwise about me then so be it. I never said anything about bad about these people or their dogs.

by hunger4justice on 08 December 2012 - 00:12

by Teufel Hunde on 08 December 2012 - 00:12
by workingdogz on 08 December 2012 - 00:12
TH if the 'breeder' doesn't take care of it on her own.


by Keith Grossman on 08 December 2012 - 01:12

by hunger4justice on 08 December 2012 - 01:12


by Teufel Hunde on 08 December 2012 - 01:12


by GSDSRULE on 08 December 2012 - 03:12
Talk about unbelievable.
by Czech DDR Lover on 08 December 2012 - 09:12
And she did. And she was victorious!!
There was a time when I respected you for your intelligence, your integrity, your honesty... respect for you in these areas have been eroded away by your repeated actions of disdain for others, chastising their breeding practices, their written contracts and a multitude of negative and narcissistic commentary about the nature of nearly every topic on earth.. Eventually, your venom bites hard on those you speak badly about, when the "facts" come from irrelevant information that is either passed along gossip from the Internet, or has nothing to do with the case at hand.
If you believed this information about TH and her family was soooo important to the facts pertaining to Corrado and your impending court case about him, then perhaps you should have MADE the time to show up in court to present all these important findings about TH to the judge. That would have been the time and place to present those things, not here, on a public forum. The judge would have been the ONLY person to decide if they were relevant or not to your case.
I'm not an attorney, but I feel pretty darn certain he would have told you that these things having to do with TH's past, her family's past, or any previous charges against them have nothing whatsoever to do with your responsibility to take care of the reimbursement of the dog which TH, in good faith and at your request, approval and direction, returned to you.

by GSD Admin on 08 December 2012 - 09:12
- Law Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
- A false and malicious statement or report about someone.
Please read here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
Carry on.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top