
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Red Sable on 06 December 2012 - 19:12
by BahCan on 06 December 2012 - 20:12
Jen, don't you think that in light of the above quote that I just took from your previous post that you probably should have just taken the puppy back, returned the money fixed the puppy and found a wonderful home for it rather than taking the road of trashing this person on multiple forums all over the internet.
If you don't have any proof either way as you say in the quote I used above, why would you continuously reference suspected abuse, multiple fracture, broken teeth, scumbags, cesspool, etc. etc. every chance you got.
If you wanted to talk about it at all on the internet why wouldn't you simply say the puppy was returned, we don't know if the problem was trauma, genetic, a combination of both or what happened. It does not bode well for your character to do what you did, and then to start bringing in the OP's past which is not relevant to your puppy really looks bad on you as a person.
Why don't you eat some Humble Pie and maybe people might have some respect for you as a human being and as a breeder. ShxT happens when you breed dogs, just own it

by Elkoorr on 06 December 2012 - 20:12

by Teufel Hunde on 06 December 2012 - 20:12

You ALWAYS have been honest to me not only about your dogs but other things as well. You have been my "go to" person when I have questions not only about Aurick, but training and Schutzhund in general. Something I thought I could also do with Jen but realised she had no knowledge or experience in the sport. Hell, she mocks us "Schutzhund" and "working dog" people openly.Most of her "dog" knowledge comes from the internet, hence why she shifts gears on subjects frequently when she finds different info.
I was first accused of feeding him wrong even though I followed HER advice. She advocated the food he was on frequently on the boards until she got him back. Then all of a sudden "new" research shows too much calcium so he has ED from that. And YES, I also have statements from the dog food company who stands behind "all stages of life" and and an independant consulting firm. The vets also agree his feeding had nothing to do with his ED.When she thought the food angle wasn't going to work, she switched to abuse.
I was never notified the check was sent, which in itself is fishy....if you wanted to be rid of somebody you owe money to wouldn't you shoot one of those ranting emails saying "your check is sent now get out of my life" ? I found out about it when I made my second request for payment on June 22nd. From June 22nd until the filing date of August 6th she had ample opportunity to make good on the money. She was well aware I was filing in small claims.

by Teufel Hunde on 06 December 2012 - 20:12
by workingdogz on 07 December 2012 - 01:12


by Teufel Hunde on 07 December 2012 - 02:12
Had she been smart and just kept her mouth shut, I would not have cared what she did/said to get him the surgery. It would have been none of my business. But she felt accusing me of abusing him was a way to get out of paying.
If only emails


by Teufel Hunde on 07 December 2012 - 02:12

by rtdmmcintyre on 07 December 2012 - 02:12
by BahCan on 07 December 2012 - 05:12
thanks
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top