This is a placeholder text
Group text
by CrzyGSD on 17 March 2010 - 03:03
Is it true that USA will not accept people back if they leave to join another organization and then decides they want to go back to USA?????????????????
Mark
Mark
by Bob-O on 17 March 2010 - 03:03
Mark, I doubt that is true, and I have heard nothing about that. I do know they now have a "loyalty pledge" on the membership renewal card and presume the same pledge exists on the new member application form. I would say that if one is no longer a member of a competing club that they should have no objection to one's membership that can be supported by the current By-Laws.
But, if I wanted to become a member of U.S.c.A. I would not advertise the fact that I had been a member in a competing club; because membership is granted by approval and not guaranteed. Just politics - I know.
I did not renew my membership in U.S.c.A. this past January, and wrote a letter that explained why. I did not state which club I was joining - it was none of U.S.c.A.'s business.
Best Regards,
Bob-O
edited - added last paragraph
But, if I wanted to become a member of U.S.c.A. I would not advertise the fact that I had been a member in a competing club; because membership is granted by approval and not guaranteed. Just politics - I know.
I did not renew my membership in U.S.c.A. this past January, and wrote a letter that explained why. I did not state which club I was joining - it was none of U.S.c.A.'s business.
Best Regards,
Bob-O
edited - added last paragraph
by Dog1 on 17 March 2010 - 15:03
Here's a link to a previous post.
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/bulletins_read/371827.html
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/bulletins_read/371827.html
by Mystere on 17 March 2010 - 16:03
quote: "Is it true that USA will not accept people back if they leave to join another organization and then decides they want to go back to USA?????????????????
Mark"
No, that is not true, Mark. In some instances, it might be best for the organization and all concerned if a few individuals weren't allowed back in (to save the organization from the trouble of having to suspend or expel them for serious character issues and actions).
I don't have any reason to believe that there is a file kept of who resigned, and there is always a certain percentage of memberships that lapse every year. Bottom- line: it would be difficult for anyone to determine who left because of the JA and who did not, with the exception of the few who actually sent letters of resignation. I have no reason to believe that even those who resigned would not be accepted back .
JMHO
Mark"
No, that is not true, Mark. In some instances, it might be best for the organization and all concerned if a few individuals weren't allowed back in (to save the organization from the trouble of having to suspend or expel them for serious character issues and actions).
I don't have any reason to believe that there is a file kept of who resigned, and there is always a certain percentage of memberships that lapse every year. Bottom- line: it would be difficult for anyone to determine who left because of the JA and who did not, with the exception of the few who actually sent letters of resignation. I have no reason to believe that even those who resigned would not be accepted back .
JMHO
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top