so real - Page 1

pretty much.......

only half?

LOL!  Love it!

http://yes-23.com/politics/another-great-way-to-explain-socialism/

What is so socialist about Obama?

Really Gsd? Believe me I'm not a republican, but the sooner Obama is out of office the better.

Why? You have nothing but he needs to go. Give examples and reasons. I see these socialism posts but no examples or reasons why people feel this way.

GSDguy are your parents billionaires?

Obama is not a true socialist, he advocates socialist policy but add's to it marxist ideals. He's not a European type socialist either. He's not a true marxist because he advocates communist ideals, he's also not a true communist because he advocates fascism ideals, he's also not a true fascist and he is definately NOT a true classic American liberal or conservative.

Knowing his policies, executive orders and how he voted in his political career, I'd venture to say he is more communist than marxist simply because America is still in a transitory socialist phase at this point. Thank goodness this phase is stalled by an active American resistance.

Obama's 2008 Campaign for change was very creavite - what he actually did was gather all the uneducated (people who don't know the US Constitution or Federalist Papers), communists, marxists, socialists, trade unionists, dictatorships of the proletariat and of course social democrats and dialectical materialists. I'd have to say he also got support from the anarchists too because they also want to abolish the States just in a non-marxist kinda way.

What his 2008 campaign did and his 2012 campaign will continue - is divide America into two very radical groups of people (2012 obviously more radical than 2008) .. it's a Marxist/Communist Manifesto text book directional vs the real America. Both inherently opposite and extreme positions.

The kicker for Obama in 2008 was he said he is a "Constitutional Scholar". His supporters who never read the Constitution believed him and trusted he was pro US Constitution, obviously they were mistaken. 

Finally and fortunately for America - Constitutional Scholars know the difference between the Laws of the Land and a usurp.

I just hope this Republic gets a fair shot to debate Obama for the 2012 general election. There is only one candidate who represents the real America to the extreme .. you know who he is. If we can get them both on the same stage to debate policy on Cable TV .. the US Constitution will win.

If we fail to get RP the GOP nomination in Tampa in August and then on to debate Obama for the general .. the US Constitution is done. It's that simple. Hell, all we have left of the US Constitution now is 2A and some of 1A. It's darn close to what Moons is waiting for.
JMO.

I don't care to post examples of why he needs to go, I won't be on here much at all in the upcoming weeks. I'm not going to get into a big time debate on why Obama should or should not be out of office.  And no, my parents are not billionaires, why do you ask? My parents are very, very hard working people who have struggled to get where they are, as have their parents.  

This conversation started to get me wondering and I thought this was fascinating:

Exerpts below are from: http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

Wealth, Income, and Power

by G. William Domhoff

This document presents details on the wealth and income distributions in the United States, and explains how we use these two distributions as power indicators.

Some of the information may come as a surprise to many people. In fact, I know it will be a surprise and then some, because of a recent study (Norton & Ariely, 2010) showing that most Americans (high income or low income, female or male, young or old, Republican or Democrat) have no idea just how concentrated the wealth distribution actually is. 

.....

Do Americans know their country's wealth distribution?

A remarkable study (Norton & Ariely, 2010) reveals that Americans have no idea that the wealth distribution (defined for them in terms of "net worth") is as concentrated as it is. 

..........

In fact, there's no country in the world that has a wealth distribution close to what Americans think is ideal when it comes to fairness.