
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by BabyEagle4U on 04 August 2011 - 00:08
Yoo Jim, what do you take of this whole mess ? (lol) You feed your dogs raw don't you ?
Anyhows, glad we have an Official Farmers for Ron Paul as of today (lol), hopefully we can save some innocent American lives before that "high risk warrant" is issued, maybe not. (lol)
by beetree on 04 August 2011 - 00:08

by BabyEagle4U on 04 August 2011 - 01:08
Do you people out there in California even have milk houses ? Or are they all government owned an/or sanctioned ? (lol) Have you ever eaten home made cheeses ? Ohh wait, ya ya that's right, cheese comes from stores not cows.

Now I know this saying is a lie "vote California and the rest of the country follows"
What a joker that idiot was and everyone who believed it ..
by beetree on 04 August 2011 - 01:08
.... and then there is the rest of the story. The New England dairy farmers have been having a cow for a long time. Go ask Vermont.

by BabyEagle4U on 04 August 2011 - 01:08
Unbelievable. Did anyone see the one truck they loaded produce, eggs and cheeses in ? What is up with that .. California loads human grade food on the same truck you haul raided animals on ? (lol) That only means one thing over here, it's hog or dog food.
How or better yet WHY is the ASPCA involved with this Raw Milk raid ? Because it comes from a cow ? LMAO I can see the future already, no more breastmilk for babies. (lol) CHEEEEZUZ
by brynjulf on 04 August 2011 - 02:08
by Preston on 04 August 2011 - 03:08
Some folks have accused the govt alphabets of outlawing raw milk and certain organic products because they want to build a "nany state" which provides for everyone's needs since the sheeple are too dumbed-down to think for themselves.
I however think that this is part of the "creeping tyranny" of a police state in the making (that is why we now have homeland security, the new American Gestapo). Like Rep. Ron Paul once said, with all these alphabets like EPA, etc. and all their new rules and regulations, folks can hardly do anything anymore, all new laws and regs supposedly done to protect us from harm. And yet if that was the real motive, why asset strip taxpayers, export all our heavy industry and manufacturing out of the country via so-called free trade agreenments (paid for under state dept grants), why start expensive unConstitutional, illegal, unprovoked, undeclared wars which wound and kill our young military and then often abandon them when they return? Why give trillions to bail out the wall street int'l commercial banks with fiat money (debt-loans that have to be repayed by the taxpayers). These bank bailouts have allegedly riddled each working family with over $160,000 debt that must be repaid to the federal reserve via taxes against the accrued ineterst of the so-called phoney "national debt", which is our own money anyway, why should we have to pay interest and re[pay it to use what is technically ours?

by BabyEagle4U on 04 August 2011 - 04:08
-- This is more than "nanny state" mentality Preston.
Ohh lets see naw ounst :
1. Purgery of Oath = federal misdemeanor
2. Conspiracy to violate rights = federal crime
3. Violation of rights = federal crime
4. Felony theft = state and federal
5. Violation of Oath = federal and state crime
Hummm
6. Brandishing a firearm in the commission of a crime = state and federal
Number 6. I didn't see a gun, but I see the bullet proof vests sooooo according to some now adays, it's the same thing.

But hey, "we are just assisting’" (lol)

by BabyEagle4U on 04 August 2011 - 22:08
"The recent act of government-sponsored terrorism against Rawesome Foods in Venice, California was authorized by a woman named Michelle LeCavalier. She signed the warrant which stated that she believed there was property at Rawesome Foods that was "used as the means of committing a felony."
http://www.rawmilk.org/default.php
by Preston on 05 August 2011 - 05:08
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top