
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Hueydo on 23 December 2015 - 15:12
So which is the more common way of doing things? Was I asking too much or was my friends breeder going way above and beyond?
by joanro on 23 December 2015 - 15:12
Others are breeders who truly care about their pups and want the best transition to their new homes, so breeder spends time and effort to prepare the puppies....all of them, not just requests fulfilled.

by kiesgsd on 23 December 2015 - 16:12
by Bavarian Wagon on 23 December 2015 - 16:12
Some people sell puppies by providing these extra services. It's easier than training and titling the parents, makes the customers feel all warm and fuzzy inside, and leads to good reviews because the breeder was so nice and accomodating. It says nothing about the quality of the dog and doesn't affect the dog in the long run...but it saves the breeder money on not having to actually test their breeding stock.

by kiesgsd on 23 December 2015 - 20:12
by hntrjmpr434 on 23 December 2015 - 23:12
In your case, I would be concerned with lack of exposure and socialization.
I handle newborns at least 3 times a day, start exposing them to different lighting and flooring at 3ish weeks, stake them out at 5ish weeks, and take them off property to socialize 5-6 days a week from 5 weeks on. Oh, and I'm a full time student(medical) and work part time. I make time for it.

by Cutaway on 24 December 2015 - 03:12
I also will do house training and basic puppy obedience commands before they leave.
This would bother me a lot... No offense to you kiesgsd but i would much prefer as little influence from the breeder as possible. For me an ideal purchase would a 6 month old that has never been worked with and only let out of their kenne to use the bathroom and exercise.
by Bavarian Wagon on 24 December 2015 - 04:12
Working with puppies? You're kidding yourself if you think that any obedience you do with a puppy under 8 weeks old means anything. It's also just a funny statement that if you don't want to do certain socializing things you shouldn't breed. Taking 5 week old puppies off your property is just asking for parvo or some other disease. I'd also say that if you're that worried about socializing and exposing your 5 week olds to the world, you're breeding subpar parents and don't believe your puppies are genetically stable in the first place, more than likely because you don't train and title to figure out what they truly have in them. A little extra work before the breeding and whelping will save more time on the back end. But like I stated in my first post, the stories you can tell your customers that make them feel warm and fuzzy inside are a much cheaper marketing ploy than actually accomplishing something with the breeding pair.

by GSD Admin on 24 December 2015 - 04:12
by hntrjmpr434 on 24 December 2015 - 13:12
Benefits far outweigh risks IMO. I know multiple breeders who do same thing, with no issues of parvo.
Breeding stable stock will get you so far, but when producing dogs for the real world, I(and many others) feel enviornmental exposure is crucial. With that said, thay aren't visiting pet stores or other high risk areas for parvo and other illnesses. They are taken to off-site facility that we own.
Genetics are certainly important, but keeping puppies in a whelping box or kennel in your backyard until they go to their new homes isn't something I agree with.
Look at the success of Logan Haus Kennels breeding program, he does tons of exposure and has recieved lots of positive feedback. Majority of his pups end up in real world homes.
Dogs can be stable, but lack enviornmental stability, which is a very important thing for me in a dog.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top