This is a placeholder text
Group text
by AgarPhranicniStraze1 on 18 April 2007 - 15:04
by zdog on 18 April 2007 - 15:04
by animules on 18 April 2007 - 15:04
by SchHBabe on 18 April 2007 - 17:04
by Sunsilver on 18 April 2007 - 18:04
by AgarPhranicniStraze1 on 18 April 2007 - 23:04
by olskoolgsds on 19 April 2007 - 06:04
by allaboutthedawgs on 19 April 2007 - 13:04
"My friend seems to think if she had the male in this situation she'd breed to this bitch in hopes of improving the temperment on the bitches side. "
I am no breeder. Nor am I an expert in these matters. However, it seems that this is a misguided desire to "improve the breed" by offsetting weaknesses of the bitch with strengths of the male. This is the polar opposite of taking a bitch with minor faults (not weaknesses) and offsetting them with a male who is particularly strong in those same areas.
Why does she want to breed this particular dog so badly? Is it to keep pups for herself (I would think that she wouldn't want another weak nerved pup any mor than a buyer would.). Is it to begin a breeding program? If so, she will quickly get a reputation of selling "iffy" or downright skittish pups. Or is it for profit? That would only leave making a buck.
And I would have to say, this stud and owner don't seem particularly stellar, either, to breed to a bitch with these issues.
To me, it seems the first step in improving the breed is to take weak dogs out of the gene pool. These dogs may be offset somewhat by a good stud in the first litter. But, ultimately, it is permeating the gene pool with undesirable traits for the breed. Just my newbie opinion.
Dawg
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top