Got milk? No, just lies - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by joanro on 26 February 2013 - 14:02

milk

U.S. dairy industry petitions FDA to approve aspartame as hidden, unlabeled additive in milk, yogurt, eggnog and cream

 

Monday, February 25, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
 


21K  
(NaturalNews) You probably already know that the FDA has declared war on raw milk and even helped fund and coordinate armed government raids against raw milk farmers and distributors. Yes, it's insane. This brand of tyranny is unique to the USA and isn't even conducted in China, North Kora or Cuba. Only in the USA are raw milk farmers treated like terrorists.

But now the situation is getting even more insane than you could have imagined: the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) have filed a petition with the FDA asking the FDA to alter the definition of "milk" to secretly include chemical sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose.

Importantly, none of these additives need to be listed on the label. They will simply be swept under the definition of "milk," so that when a company lists "milk" on the label, it automatically includes aspartame or sucralose. And if you're trying to avoid aspartame, you'll have no way of doing so because it won't be listed on the label.

This isn't only for milk, either: It's also for yogurt, cream, sour cream, eggnog, whipping cream and a total of 17 products, all of which are listed in the petition at FDA.gov.

As the petition states:

IDFA and NMPF request their proposed amendments to the milk standard of identity to allow optional characterizing flavoring ingredients used in milk (e.g., chocolate flavoring added to milk) to be sweetened with any safe and suitable sweetener -- including non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame.

This is all being done to "save the children," we're told, because the use of aspartame in milk products would reduce calories.

Milk industry specifically asks to HIDE aspartame from consumers

Astonishingly, the dairy industry is engaged in extreme doublespeak logic and actually arguing that aspartame should be hidden from consumers by not listing it on the label. Here's what the petition says:

IDFA and NMPF argue that nutrient content claims such as "reduced calorie" are not attractive to children, and maintain that consumers can more easily identify the overall nutritional value of milk products that are flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners if the labels do not include such claims. Further, the petitioners assert that consumers do not recognize milk -- including flavored milk -- as necessarily containing sugar. Accordingly, the petitioners state that milk flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners should be labeled as milk without further claims so that consumers can "more easily identify its overall nutritional value."

In other words, hiding aspartame from consumers by not including it on the label actually helps consumers, according to the IDFA and NMPF!

Yep, consumers are best served by keeping them ignorant. If this logic smacks of the same kind of twisted deception practiced by Monsanto, that's because it's identical: the less consumers know, the more they are helped, according to industry. And it's for the children, too, because children are also best served by keeping them poisoned with aspartame.

Consumers have always been kept in the dark about pink slime, meat glue, rBGH and GMOs in their food. And now, if the IDFA gets its way, you'll be able to drink hormone-contaminated milk from an antibiotics-inundated cow fed genetically modified crops and producing milk containing hidden aspartame. And you won't have the right to know about any of this!

The FDA confirms this "secret" status of aspartame, stating, "If the standard of identity for milk is amended as requested by petitioners, milk manufacturers could use non-nutritive sweeteners in flavored milk without a nutrient content claim in its labeling."

FDA requests comments

The FDA is requesting comments on this petition. You have until May 21st, 2013 to submit your comments. Click here for instructions.

This is a clue to stop drinking processed milk and milk products altogether

There's a bigger story here than just the industry hoping to get FDA approval to secretly put aspartame in milk products while not listing aspartame on the label.

The bigger question is this: If an industry is pushing to hide aspartame in its products, what else is it already hiding?

How about the pus content of its dairy products? How about its inhumane treatment of animals who are subjected to torture conditions and pumped full of genetically engineered hormones? How about the fact that homogenization and pasteurization turn a whole food into a dietary nightmare that promotes obesity, autoimmune disorders and cardiovascular disease?

There are lots of dirty little secrets in the dairy industry of course, and that doesn't even get into the secret closed-door conversations to encourage the FDA to destroy the competition of raw milk.

The only rational answer to all this is to stop buying and consuming processed dairy products, period!

I gave up ALL milk products many years ago and have never looked back. I drink almond milk, not pus-filled pasteurized cow's milk. (Click here for a recipe to make your own almond milk at home.) I don't eat yogurt. If I want probiotics, I get them from tasty chewable probiotics supplements such as Sunbiotics. I parted ways with processed dairy products many years ago, and as a result, my cardiovascular health, skin health, digestive health and stamina have all remained in outstanding shape.

There's also a philosophical issue here: Don't buy products from an industry that habitually LIES about everything. The dairy industry is like a mafia. They actively seek to destroy the competition, keep consumers ignorant and monopolize the market. They run highly deceptive ads with ridiculous claims like, "drinking milk helps you lose weight" and other nonsense.

The U.S. dairy industry is steeped in deception at every level, and now they want you and your children to unknowingly drink aspartame that's secretly blended into the product.

The dairy industry is to food as Lance Armstrong is to sports. It's all a big lie, laced with secret chemicals and false claims.

Stop drinking milk. Stop financially supporting the food mafia.

Recommended videos:
Raw Milk Rover (hilarious animation)
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=273C2497DFDE9F61CB9E8867113CA5CA

Got a PUStache? (satire)
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=C463AA940B9AEBA5D294F87FF0716579

Jonathan Emord raw milk freedom speech:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=F8DF9A42CC5479D8829A2445C56AFEF3

Farmageddon interview with Kristin Canty
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=3340FCCC93B2C17EEFA43C7E6296728D

Sources for this article:
This petition was originally brought to our attention by a reader who says it was covered on Activist Post. I haven't yet read that article but may update this article with a link to that article once I identify the URL.

FDA petition page:
http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/02/20/2013-03835/flavore...


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039244_milk_aspartame_FDA_petition.html#ixzz2M17kHpwB

leeshideaway

by leeshideaway on 26 February 2013 - 16:02


Micaho

by Micaho on 26 February 2013 - 16:02

Good article, Joanro.  It sounds as though the sweetners are only added to flavored dairy products, so most plain milk, cream and yogurt would not be affected?  I  would think the "reduced calorie" labeling would actually be a selling point with adults purchasing the majority of the products for themselves and their children.  So in the future the exceptions without the artifical sweetners, "aspartame-free" products, will then again be re-introduced.  Everything is cyclical and so far behind the scientific information available!  The real problem is that the FDA still believes sucralose and aspartame are "safe and suitable" sweetners. .

by joanro on 26 February 2013 - 16:02

From what I gleaned from the article, yogurt, whipped cream, actually anything but 'white'milk (watered down, really) will contain chemical sweetner. FDA knows dam well that aspartame is poisonous, so does the milk industry. That's why they want it hidden from ingredients list.

by beetree on 26 February 2013 - 17:02

It means they want these sweeteners classified on the same level as a "sugar", so new labeling is not needed. I don't like the idea myself. I might just tell them so. If it is about what leads to the choices that prevent child obesity, we the consumer should decide how or what is a benefit, but only if we know what we are drinking. So, put it on the labels, teach everyone to read and make their own choices.

I would never buy any milk with those additives. Same with the soy and almond drink substitutes. I think they are worse than a cold cup of grade A, pasteurized, homogenized, vitamin D added, whole milk.



BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 26 February 2013 - 17:02

Great article but I want to clarify some things before people think of all dairy farmers. When ever you hear or see the two words "Big Dairy" that is a direct meaning of government sponsored productions. Not private independent dairies.

That said and like the article states - "The only rational answer to all this is to stop buying and consuming processed dairy products, period!"

There is a BIG difference between "Big Dairy" cow juice and Milk. Milk not processed in it's pure form (aka RAW MILK) is just that "Milk" everything else is "cow juice" because it's processed dairy.

This whole aspartame deal is directly linked to Monsanto because it's a genetically modified chemical "bacteria" and created in the same factories as Monsanto's GMO genes.

Aspartame genes are a abortifacient and teratogen which means if added to RAW Milk the bacteria in the RAW Milk will attack and kill it - thus spoiling the milk !!! Asparatame is genetically engineered in E. coli bacteria. So the story above is NOT refering to RAW Milk .. it's refering to cow juice and flavored cow juices and everything made by "processed" cow juices. Milk straight from the cow does NOT EVER contain E. coli bacteria - ONLY processed cow juices contain E. coli. So their aspartame gene creation started in processed cow juices !!! NOT RAW Milk !!!!

Monsanto and it's biochemical warfare must be stopped !!! Demand your state to allow RAW Milk sales !!!!  And ........

Support your local farmers !!!!!




by beetree on 26 February 2013 - 17:02

Don't be ignorant, read all about Aspartame:

http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/e-numbers/102.aspartame.html

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 February 2013 - 17:02

We have very few local dairy farmers left around here, and they are small, but still there are a few.
Fresh milk still needs some processing, and I doubt many of you have ever tasted fresh milk before it gets watered down.
Not sure how raw you mean when you say raw.

What you buy in a store is not milk, it's milk flavored, and poorly at that.
And then comes the additives.
FDA is a joke.

Monsanto.........
burn it all down.



by joanro on 26 February 2013 - 17:02

BE, the author mentions the "dirty little secrets" of FDA and big milk industry trying to get FDA to squash all Raw Milk producers. I love yogurt, but quit buying it because of the ingredient list these days. So I'm going to take one or two fresh goat does this year to the barn, so i can milk them. Real yogurt made from fresh, raw goat milk is better than ice-cream.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 26 February 2013 - 17:02

Bee,
is that a joke?





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top