Fact Check: Does George Soros Own an Overseas Company That Will Count U.S. Votes?

• Posted on September 13, 2012 at 4:21pm by Becket Adams

Does a major Obama donor own an overseas company that will control the U.S.’s entire vote-counting system? The simple answer: No. But let’s expand on this because, obviously, it would be highly disturbing (to say the very least) if it were true.

The claim goes something like this [as noted by Snopes]:

The Obama administration has sold the processing rights of our votes in the general election to a company from Spain (SCYTL) It will no longer be possible to track and verify our votes. The CEO of the company donated the maximum amount to Obamas’ 2008 campaign.

And, according to similar emails, Scytl has strong ties to billionaire currency speculator, liberal activist, and Democrat donor George Soros (looks legit, right?):

�GEORGE SOROS, BARACK OBAMA‘S NUMBER ONE SUPPORTER AND SOURCE OF THE PRESIDENT’S LARGEST CORPORATE DONATIONS, WILL CONTROL YOUR VOTES IN THE UP COMING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION � Follow the bouncing ball on the criminal corruption ruse of your USA votes.

1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?

2.) Obama outsourced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.

3.) But recently, SOE software has now been sold to a company named SCYTL, owned by George Soros, headquartered in Spain.

4.) The votes will go to SCYTL, the question becomes as to WHY Must local votes for each precinct will be downloaded to SCYTL�s main server � leaving no TRACEABLE record of how many, and what votes were scored! Which of course means that said votes will be MERGED; and any discrepancies at lower levels will be IMPOSSIBLE to track.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fact-check-does-soros-own-an-overseas-company-that-will-count-u-s-votes/
 

SM, did you read the Snopes link you posted?  Dircetly below The Obama administration has sold the processing rights of our votes in the general election to a company from Spain (SCYTL) It will no longer be possible to track and verify our votes. The CEO of the company donated the maximum amount to Obamas’ 2008 campaign. it states the claim is FALSE!  It helps to check sources before posting.

It's a wonder how some people survive day to day life.  It really is.

I don't know if the story about the Spanish company which will count US votes was actually acquired by a Soros company.  But it is well known that Snopes has been completely discredited and caught numerous times spreading incorrect information.  They simply have no credibility at are not authorities on anything.  Do some detailed research on them and see.  A lot of the so called fact checking websites are misinformation sites.

Here is what we do know for certain:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/spanish-company-will-count-american-votes-overseas-in-november/

By the way, SitusMom, you do seem to come upwith cutting edge stories.  Good work.

For those that want to investigate vote fraud in America, a highly resepcted source which has been well validated in the site "Black Box Voting".

Preston, it was the source cited for the information, so you can't really discount it, trusted or not.  When anyone can come up with verified facts, I'll be willing to take a look... until then, it's bogus.  And, as Snopes does note, which IS fact, the federal government has nothing to do with tabulating votes, it's up to individual states.  That's not something that can be skewed, so that right there pretty much puts this one to bed.

"It's a wonder how some people survive day to day life. It really is."

It does make one question evolutionary theory; does it not?

" But it is well known that Snopes has been completely discredited and caught numerous times spreading incorrect information."

Bullshit.  It is, however, well known that you have been completely discredited and caught numerous times spreading incorrect information.

It does make one question evolutionary theory; does it not?
Keith, is there really a reason to get nasty?  You can disagree with someone without demeaning them.  I've met SM and she's a lovely, intelligent, kind and caring woman.  She would never put someone down like you just did, so I guess that says something in itself, since she's not the one displaying apelike behavior!

In the last three years,

Unemployment is up, economic growth is down, foreclosures are up, gas prices are up, median income is down, and the national debt is way up.

How's that for evolution?

Grossman, I've never been caught spreading misinformation ansd not discredited at all.  In fact I am well respected for my many published articles by experienced professionals with long track records of success and who are well known and also well respected, leaders in their fields. My credentials are spotless.  I retired with a 100% clean record in good standing. On the otherhand, you act like you think you know what is going on but your sources are limited and your information incomplete or biased.   And you react emotionally and then just spout off ignorantly IMO.

Basically you are naive about how the world really functions.  You have no serious background with which to base your opinions.  And you appear to react at an emotional level to anything that rubs your politics the wrong way, by attacking the messenger rather than responding rationally to the message.  No need for personal attacks or such immature reactions.

By the way, Snopes has been completely discredited.  Those who run it are two nobodies with no established professional credentials of any merit to the matters they attempt to be the final word on.  They have been caught numerous times publishing misinformation.  Some believe they have been secretly aligned and/or supported by Soros. On that I do not know but it wouldn't surprise me. Perhaps folks can dig that out doing research on the Internet using available search engines (some of which are very, very good and also proxied).

http://www.redstate.com/lastgopinillinois/2012/04/11/election-fraud-now-outsourced-to-socialist-spain/
Just to present balance it is important to note that the Republicans as well as the democrats have long histories of vote fraud. For example, JFK won his election because of the Chitown democratic machine voted thousands of dead people in exchange for favors promised to Giancana and the outfit, favors then which did not materialize. Republicans were shown to have faked votes in Florida in Gore's election and without the Supreme Court interfering would probably have won. In order to understand the massive history of vote fraud one would have to study the history of Votefraud, including the now defunce Voter News Services (VNS) in NYC owned by the international major mass media companies which used to count the votes electronically before they announced the results. This was a huge scandal which was never public exposed. Electronic voting has been proven to be easy to hack and many experts have shown there is likely a fair amount of vote manipulation.  The only sure cure and prevention is the use of paper ballots which are hand counted and checked for accuracy.