
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Two Moons on 16 April 2013 - 00:04
GSD says it is....

by GSD Admin on 16 April 2013 - 01:04
"Well, looks like my projection wasn't too far off!"
Right, and had they used an automatic weapon there might be 30, 40 or more dead. This was probably a terrorist attack a lot different than someone walking into a school, library or sport stadium and opening fire. Look at the school shooting 5 minutes to kill 26.
Right, and had they used an automatic weapon there might be 30, 40 or more dead. This was probably a terrorist attack a lot different than someone walking into a school, library or sport stadium and opening fire. Look at the school shooting 5 minutes to kill 26.

by GSD Admin on 16 April 2013 - 02:04
"Thank god someone finally took the time to build a bomb instead of taking the easy way and shooting a gun..."
I heard the government was involved so they could go after bomb makers. Maybe the government pulled it off so they can go after materials that can be used to make bombs? Did you see the picture of the person on the roof? Was he questioned? Was there 2 guys in the woods?
I heard the government was involved so they could go after bomb makers. Maybe the government pulled it off so they can go after materials that can be used to make bombs? Did you see the picture of the person on the roof? Was he questioned? Was there 2 guys in the woods?

by BabyEagle4U on 16 April 2013 - 08:04
deleted.
never mind not worth it

by Two Moons on 16 April 2013 - 13:04
GSD,
had someone used a weapon as you suggest, the streets were full of police, homeland, and military, I don't think it would have lasted long.
The bombs were low yield and amature in my opinion, not something you'd expect from an organized terrorist group.
I think this is domestic and Travels is right, sooner or later this was gonna happen.
It's what others around the world live with everyday, maybe now it's our turn.
Moons.
had someone used a weapon as you suggest, the streets were full of police, homeland, and military, I don't think it would have lasted long.
The bombs were low yield and amature in my opinion, not something you'd expect from an organized terrorist group.
I think this is domestic and Travels is right, sooner or later this was gonna happen.
It's what others around the world live with everyday, maybe now it's our turn.
Moons.

by GSD Admin on 16 April 2013 - 13:04
It only takes minutes to kill 20 kids and 6 adults who were in different rooms. Bombs have been used in the past you guys act like this is the first time ever. More people die from guns than all other forms of killing combined. You all seem to want to look past that fact.

by Two Moons on 16 April 2013 - 13:04
People gotta die some how.
No not the first, Oklahoma wasn't the first either, just one of the bigger events.
No not the first, Oklahoma wasn't the first either, just one of the bigger events.

by Two Moons on 16 April 2013 - 13:04
You know trash cans are one of the first things to go from any route the president is planning on taking.
And where was Homeland security?
And where was Homeland security?

by GSD Admin on 16 April 2013 - 14:04
I will put this here as not to start a conspiracy thread on its own. Speaking of conspiracy and common sense can those be uttered in the same breath, lmao.
Anyways I found what this witness has to say to be pretty weird.
http://www.local15tv.com/mostpopular/story/UM-Coach-Bomb-Sniffing-Dogs-Spotters-on-Roofs/BrirjAzFPUKKN8z6eSDJEA.cspx
University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.
"They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it's just a training exercise," Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.
Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He's been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.
"Evidently, I don't believe they were just having a training exercise," Stevenson said. "I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in."
CNN reports a state government official said there were no credible threats before the race.
Stevenson had just finished the marathon before the explosions. Stevenson said his wife had been sitting in one of the seating sections where an explosion went off, but thankfully she left her seat and was walking to meet up with him.
"We are just so thankful right now," Stevenson said.
Anyways I found what this witness has to say to be pretty weird.
http://www.local15tv.com/mostpopular/story/UM-Coach-Bomb-Sniffing-Dogs-Spotters-on-Roofs/BrirjAzFPUKKN8z6eSDJEA.cspx
University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.
"They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it's just a training exercise," Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.
Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He's been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.
"Evidently, I don't believe they were just having a training exercise," Stevenson said. "I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in."
CNN reports a state government official said there were no credible threats before the race.
Stevenson had just finished the marathon before the explosions. Stevenson said his wife had been sitting in one of the seating sections where an explosion went off, but thankfully she left her seat and was walking to meet up with him.
"We are just so thankful right now," Stevenson said.

by Two Moons on 16 April 2013 - 14:04
It does make you wonder doesn't it?
This is why we should question everything and not just take things at their face value.
This is why we should question everything and not just take things at their face value.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top