This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Two Moons on 13 April 2013 - 23:04
I was just kidding about Canada Felloffher,
It's a beautiful country.
Specially the less inhabited parts.
It's a beautiful country.
Specially the less inhabited parts.
by Felloffher on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Moons,
The "LOL" kind of gave you away.
The "LOL" kind of gave you away.
by Two Moons on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
You do have some restrictive laws though, I looked up some of them, I never knew actually.
by Felloffher on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Yep, social engineering at it's finest, we are punished and the criminals just keeping doing what the do. Our province banned the possession of body armor because gang members are wearing it, how does that even make sense? The straw is close to breaking among many of us.
by Two Moons on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Body armor is restricted here too though, even armored vehicles.
The gangs will get whatever they need as always.
The gangs will get whatever they need as always.
by Two Moons on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Gangs
That's another major growing problem here that they don't talk about while gun legislations pending.
That's another major growing problem here that they don't talk about while gun legislations pending.
by GSD Admin on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Guns and violence only lead to more guns and more violence. Listen. I can respect you guys view but it doesn't mean I have to agree. Most of these mass shooting are people who were bullied and this is their way to fight back. What is to be expected? Just like if you beat your child that child will beat their child and the cycle will continue until someone finally breaks it.
I just can't agree more guns are better.
I just can't agree more guns are better.
by Two Moons on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Not more.
In a perfect world all guns could dissappear, and all bombs, chemical and gas agents.
Man will still kill his fellow man GSD.
In a perfect world all guns could dissappear, and all bombs, chemical and gas agents.
Man will still kill his fellow man GSD.
by GSD Admin on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
They may kill each other but not as quickly and easily as pulling a trigger. And there is absolutely no reason to let the general public have assault rifles. Where does it end? I mean if the 2nd allows any weapon then where does it end?
by Two Moons on 14 April 2013 - 00:04
Well first of all it seems quicker and easier but if you go back through time you'll see mans always been good at it and always advancing their methods.
And second, the actual reason and the Constitution, we bear arms to protect our freedom from within, that's the whole purpose.
And though we can't afford parody we at least try to keep up with their advances and methods.
Where does it end?
No one wants to hear it but it's gonna end badly, everywhere.
It's like the baby seal, people will just stand around and watch, doing nothing.
And when they do decide to move they will make poor choices.
Oh well.
And second, the actual reason and the Constitution, we bear arms to protect our freedom from within, that's the whole purpose.
And though we can't afford parody we at least try to keep up with their advances and methods.
Where does it end?
No one wants to hear it but it's gonna end badly, everywhere.
It's like the baby seal, people will just stand around and watch, doing nothing.
And when they do decide to move they will make poor choices.
Oh well.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top