DM through lineage - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Nans gsd on 07 February 2017 - 23:02

Thumbs up to Beetree. 


furryflurry

by furryflurry on 08 February 2017 - 00:02

Double thumbs up to Beetree. It is a horrible feeling.

Jenni78

by Jenni78 on 08 February 2017 - 04:02

This is a MUST read for anyone remotely concerned about DM. http://duitseherderdatabase.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/dm-modifier.pdf

The issue people have with the test *IS* the lack of science behind it. The argument from the other side, wrought with emotion (and rightfully so) is that we have the science and we should use it. Well, plenty of us do. But it's not enough. We are close(ish?) but as this study illustrates...we may be on the wrong track in terms of what actually causes DM in the GSD, and how prevalent (or not?) it is. 


Hundmutter

by Hundmutter on 08 February 2017 - 06:02

Jenni - Thumbs UpThumbs Up


by beetree on 08 February 2017 - 12:02

The problem is the need for more science for better undertanding. Not the lack of science having been done. This study begins to address that.

I don't reach the same conclusion regarding the GSD breed as is being suggested. It was not one of the specifically mentioned breeds in the Swedish study hypothesis. What it suggests is there are modifier genes, haloypes, that come into play with the gene that is currently available for testing. Four countries are seeking new patents for their own testing processes.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top