by Maverick13 on 26 November 2012 - 06:11
I am having an issue with one of my puppy buyers and would like some advice on the best way to proceed.
On the 5th of September the buyer came to pick up the puppy. She was at my place for about 2 hours and saw the puppy playing with the parents and another litter mate that was with me. On the 6th of September she sent me and email claiming the puppy was not in good condition and that she suspected the puppy had mange. I called her immediately and informed her that there was no way she could have mange as none of my dogs have ever had any problems with mange. She took the puppy to another vet and was informed that it was a small puppy rash and nothing to be worried about.
On the 7th of October she sent me another mail saying that she noticed the puppy walking funny on the 20th of September and took the puppy for an x ray and the vet confirmed that the puppy had a ‘severe’ calcium deficiency. She wanted to renegotiate the price. Once again instead of emailing her, I called her (the reason I did not email is because I wanted to give the personal attention of calling and speaking with her but in hindsight it would have been best to have something in writing) and told her that I was willing to take the puppy back and refund the full amount. She did not want this. Then again towards the end of October she sent me another mail asking if I could refund 50% of the money to her. I do not do this for the money, as all breeders know there is no money to be made from breeding but I felt the best option was to take the puppy back and refund the full amount to the buyer. She once again did not want to do this and insulted me by saying that she did not feel that the puppy would be looked after adequately in my care. My German Shepherds are the best in my country at the moment and they receive the best care, however I did not argue with her as I felt she was taking her frustrations out on me. I delayed in contacting her this time as I was speaking with people trying to find the best solution. I finally offered to take the puppy back but she refused again.
I received another email today asking for 50% of the money and she wants to keep the puppy. I have no problem returning the money to her, but everyone I have spoken to including the vets who look after the puppy have told me not to refund half the money as it is a sign of me accepting the accusations against me. The vet has also informed me that he checked on the puppy about a week ago and she is fine. However the buyer insists I gave her a bad dog. If any of the buyers feel they have received a bad dog I am glad to refund the full amount and take the puppy back. This is the first complaint I have received. What upsets me is that she was at my house looking at the puppy playing with the litter mate and parents for a good 2 hours and was fine taking the puppy. But after some time she is complaining I sold her a bad dog.
Should I simply give her 50% of the money back or should the only alternative be that she returns the puppy to me and I give her the full amount back. I have no problem giving her the full amount back. Also please note that at no point has the buyer been aggressive or rude to me, except when she insulted me on how I take care of my dogs which I let slide once because I believed she was just taking her frustrations out on me. I do however, feel that she is trying to bully me into giving her half the money back and she gets the advantage of keeping a show quality puppy.
Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
by J Basler on 26 November 2012 - 07:11
by Hutchins on 26 November 2012 - 07:11
Just for what's it worth, just because no other dog in your breeding program hasn't had mange or any other health issue before, does not mean this puppy can't get it. There is always a first time for everything although both parents have never produced it before.
Good luck, and keep us posted!
by Maverick13 on 26 November 2012 - 07:11
Hutchins, In my country there are no agreements/warranty when puppies are sold and this puppy was sold in good faith. That is why I am more than willing to take back the puppy and give a full refund which the buyer is refusing to do. She was sold on a full registration as we do not have limited registrations. The mange issue I am hundred percent certain the puppy did not have as the second vet confirmed it was not mange to the buyer and the puppy is free from any skin issues. Since the first complaint of mange she has not brought that up even during the conversations as she knows the puppy was misdiagnosed by the first vet. The calcium deficiency, i do understand the possibility that the puppy may have had it as Hutchins pointed out, but the vet informed me that the puppy is now fine but I am still ok to give a full refund. If someone is not happy with a puppy purchased from me, it is my opinion that I should give them a full refund and take the puppy back. However in this instance she keeps refusing to accept the full refund which is what is bothering me.
I do not want to keep dragging the issue with the buyer but if she is not willing to accept the full refund what are my options? Stand my ground on only giving the full refund or give in to the buyer's request of refunding 50% of the money?
by hexe on 26 November 2012 - 08:11
Regarding the question of whether to refund the buyer's money or not--as Hutchins asks, first you have to consider what your warranty provides for, if you have one. Not all breeders have warranties, and personally, I have no use for them as a buyer--once I've bought the dog, it's mine, for better or worse. From this point forward, with this buyer, even if you speak to them in person on via telephone, follow up that conversation with an email documenting EVERYTHING that was discussed. Take notes while you're talking to them so you can be specific. You always need to keep documentation...always!
I'd want to see the veterinary report that stated the puppy had a 'severe calcium deficiency', for starters, before I'd give any consideration to refunding any money without having the pup returned to me. If the vet did indeed make such a finding, it's worth something to you to have this information--if nothing else, it's worth the cost of the vet visit, x-ray and whatever treatment was prescribed. But I doubt this is even true.
If you have a warranty, you and the buyer need to follow that, or both agree IN WRITING to alter that warranty to whatever you both agree is fair. If you have no warranty or contract, personally, I think it's got to be an all-or-nothing deal: you refund the full purchase price and the buyer returns the puppy and transfers any registration paperwork, or the buyer can keep the puppy and you keep the money. If for some reason you decide it's worth it to you to refund part of the purchase price, you better make sure you have some kind of written disclaimer drawn up that both you and the buyer sign--if your country uses notaries to witness signatures, go that route, too--indicating that the refund is NOT being made due to any defect, flaw, fault, physical, mental or medical condition affecting said puppy, and is rather a 'good will' gesture on your part. Find out what is needed for a document such as this to hold up in court in your country, and make sure you follow those requirements to the letter.
Me, I think I'd want to get my puppy out of the buyer's hands if they are so dissatisfied as to want a partial refund...
by supakamario on 26 November 2012 - 10:11
by GSDGenetics on 26 November 2012 - 11:11
I didn't see one word about the person offering or providing any kind of documentation, test results, or any other valid proof that the dog in question was ever seen by a vet or diagnosed with any of the claimed problems.
I would ask the complainant to provide me or my vet with the xray for the calcium deficiency diagnosis, proof of the skin scrapings and diagnosis of the mange, what type of mange was diagnosed, treatment recommendations for these alleged problems, proof of any medications dispensed to treat those problems and I would request that the complainant copy and send you copies of all the paperwork the veterinary clinic gave her for her dog before you can even consider whether or not the situation merits any kind of refund.
If the complainant isn't concerned enough about the situation to willingly provide you with the xray and other legitimate veterinary proof of these things, including paperwork written or typed on legitimate vet clinic forms with the clinic's name, address, phone number, etc printed on the paperwork, that strongly shows her motives are not legitimate at all.
A person can claim anything they want to claim, but its the proof that separates the lies from the truth.
by MichaelCox on 26 November 2012 - 23:11
You must listen to me and then repeat it several times in front of a mirror while turning in circles holding a half full glass of milk.
"They will bad mouth me even after I give them what they want!"
There is no way around this. You will eventually give in and they know this. They have nothing to lose and everything to gain. They have all the time in the world to send you and three other companies harassing emails and calls. You do not! They know this and will exploit it.
Stick to your guns! Do not give in! If they want to give you the dog back great but they won't! If the dog was that bad why does she want it? She simply has buyers remorse and wants to get money out of you. Offer one more time to take the dog back and then make it clear that this is your final offer and you will not reply anymore. After that stick to it. Once the word gets out (and it will) that you are a push over they will come out of the wood work.
by brynjulf on 27 November 2012 - 00:11
by jmopaso on 27 November 2012 - 00:11
You must be logged in to reply to posts