This is a placeholder text
Group text
by beetree on 18 August 2012 - 22:08
by Gustav on 18 August 2012 - 23:08
by Sunsilver on 19 August 2012 - 02:08
by darylehret on 19 August 2012 - 03:08
What about the 70 years before that, when it was inevitable? Discussion after discussion about "genetic diversity" has proven to me that some people will believe what they want, stick with their stance, regardless of the evidence before them. There is NO scientific evidence that PROVES genetic diversity is critical to the fitness survival of a species. In fact, "too much" causes genetic drift, or outbreeding depression.
by beetree on 19 August 2012 - 03:08
by darylehret on 19 August 2012 - 03:08
Crock of houey is all the science you need to know. Breeding is obviously more politics than science.
by duke1965 on 19 August 2012 - 05:08
Gustav , how many generations you think you can REALLY outcross before you are forced to start doubling up names on your pedigree, even if you dont want
close inbreeding as done by mother earthhttp://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/WR03007.htm
if Im correct this closed population was based on three male animals without introduction of new blood in about 90 years
by darylehret on 19 August 2012 - 05:08
Nobody ever seems to discuss the importance of "genetic consistency" do they? That explains more trouble with the breed than anything else could. Frequently, the words "importance" and "diversity" are combined, and no one ever seems to get around to describing the HOW or WHY of diversity's "importance". We're just told that it IS, and that's what we should believe.
This naturally leads to the belief that outcrossing is the solution to improving genetic diversity, which isn't necessarily so. Outcrossing causes genetic drift, and outbreeding depression. Fact of the matter is, inbreeding depression, homeostasis, heterosis, and outbreeding depression ALL occur on different traits in EACH individual produced. And "backmassing" means nothing in scientific terms or in breeding, that I'm aware of.
Genetic drift is the change in allele frequencies due to random sampling (meaning, absent of "selection" pressures). Breeding for the sake of outcrossing will actually REDUCE the level of genetic diversity in a population. Genetic drift and selection are two simultaneous occuring forces of evolution. SELECTION is the single greatest power of the breeder, and it's use determines the CONSISTENCY of his breeding. If the PRESERVATION of a trait is the focus of a breeding, then selection MUST be the acting force.
Outbreeding depression may arise due to two different mechanisms. First, outbreeding depression is usually attributed to genotype X environment interactions when populations are adapted to different environmental conditions. The hybrid population will then contain genotypic combinations of alleles that may be less suited to either environment.
A more complex type of outbreeding depression occurs when different populations have evolved different coadapted gene complexes. Coadapted gene complexes are groups of loci whose fitness depends on interactions between loci (epistatic interactions). Particular combinations of alleles at different loci are needed to produce favorable effects. Recombination in hybrid populations produces new combinations of alleles that are deleterious.
by duke1965 on 19 August 2012 - 06:08
so I prefer to listen to those that have hands on experience, long time breeders of dogs , cattle, homing pigions and such and find that nature is often not listening to the books, even in my own 25 years of breeding seen things go against what is written by some
many people ,unfortunately only repeat what they heard without any hands on experience to underbuild what they are writing, but all together creating public opinion
people should read and remember a part of darylls previous post that the most important part about breeding is SELECTION, what animals do you choose to continue with, and as long as selection is mainly focussed on podium places instead of health and actual qualities, you are going nowhere, if we are mistaking agression and prey for determination and courage and stability, we are going the wrong way
here are some of mother earths creations, now think about how much genetic diversity they have in the individual animals, and I dare anyone to find me 5 closely related german shepherds that even come close to the similarity these animals have, so really how much more diversity do we want, both in looks and caracter/temperament
by joanro on 19 August 2012 - 11:08
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top