This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Love My Canine on 05 February 2011 - 16:02
by Dianq12 on 13 February 2011 - 00:02
Dr. Yonnet said he would never put his dog in danger. No owner would knowingly place his animal in harms way. Can he predict with 100% certainty what is around the next tree or corner for the rest of Eon's life? I think not.
Every program, including the one where I obtained my service dogs over the years, makes you aware of your duties and lists prohibitions very clearly. In this case violations occurred, and CCI has the absolute right to take the dog back. (In my case, the program turned ownership of my dogs to me when I completed training, but it can still revoke his certification. BTW, I've never had a CCI service dog.)
I do not have one iota of sympathy for the man, BUT my heart goes out to Elon. The dog suffers as a result of the handler's errors in judgement. That is the way it always happens, doesn't it?
by Prager on 13 February 2011 - 16:02
CCIs response is a good cap out. On the other hand Mr Yonnet should not accept the dog under the conditions which he could not keep. I would not deal with organisation which has such rules. What are they?
The way the CCI handeled the situation is deplorable.Oh yeah and "great" PR job!!!
Hans
by Sunsilver on 13 February 2011 - 23:02
The dealbreak for me was they also said I had to get rid of any dogs I had as pets. At that time, I had a 13 year old German Shepherd, which I'd owned since she was 9 mo. To rehome a dog that old would have been worse than cruel to both of us.
by Prager on 14 February 2011 - 15:02
What is wrong with working with people and their dogs and their every day life needs and loves and situations, so that the new support dog will fit into their complete life without emotional upheaval?
I have worked with several deaf people and trained their dogs ( some I have given them) to respond to fire alarm and door bell, phone and so on. It was fun and it was a lot off work and I have charged nothing or for all that the same as for basic obedience even so it took 10x longer. Unfortunately I do not have time to do this any more,.... But back then when I have done this work it would never crossed my mind to put any restriction on the dog or the owner. It became their dogs and with their needs came responsibility to maintain the dog so that they can keep benefiting from it.
http://www.alpinek9.com
by CrysBuck25 on 14 February 2011 - 17:02
I think that maybe too many of these organizations view dogs as so much more than dogs, and they feel that they have the right to dictate everything done with or to that dog. And by people continuing to support these groups, their dictatorial policies are reinforced.
Now I realize that there is a lot of time invested in these dogs, as well as money, but once the dog has been placed, that really should be the end of it. You don't sell a car and then expect someone to come take it away from you if you don't wash and wax it once a month, and while this is oversimplification of the issue, it very much boils down to the same thing.
If a lot of people let these groups know that their policies are offensive and hurtful to both the animals and the humans involved, it might go a long way toward fixing the problems. God knows, a service dog is still a dog, and needs to be able to run and play.
Crys
by Jeff Oehlsen on 14 February 2011 - 18:02
So, they take the dog back and get 30,000 for him again ? Sounds like a good money making scheme.
by Mindhunt on 15 February 2011 - 00:02
We have something similar here. Follow the rules to the letter, no harsh words, voice raised in anger, nothing allowed but an approved harness or flat collar, no corrections either, and the dog must always be on an approved 6 ft leash or supervised in a fenced in yard without any hazards (fencing material, yard, etc must be approved). Oh and the dog is borrowed not given. The list goes on. Unfortunately the people running the program have more "good intentions" than any real dog experience or knowledge. The dangers of "good intentions" without knowledge.
by SitasMom on 15 February 2011 - 20:02
the guy broke the rules.........
the guy looses the dog and gains an important life lesson.......
sad story, but good lesson.
by VonIsengard on 15 February 2011 - 20:02
There must be more to this story.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top