
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Keith Grossman on 18 January 2010 - 22:01
Now, Jen; I never implied any such thing. I'm still waiting for you to tell us how the dogs from eastern bloc countries, who were essentially segregated from the rest of the world for 45 years, achieved such diversity in their bloodlines?
When you're done wrestling with that question (and for the time being we'll ignore the obvious question of the accuracy of their pedigrees), start working on your explanation of how people who stood in line for hours for a loaf of bread and drove what were essentailly cardboard cars managed to actually get x-rays and meaningful hip certifications on their dogs.
I'm just wondering; it isn't like I was living in Germany while the wall was up...oh, wait, yes, I was!

by Keith Grossman on 18 January 2010 - 22:01
Uh, oh... you're probably not going to like what I just posted.


by Jenni78 on 18 January 2010 - 22:01

Edited to add....though I kind of disagee w/the importance you are placing on hip xrays, etc. I'd call dogs living/thriving in this kind of environment fairly strong, and I would think that especially people w/nothing would certainly not be allowing useless dogs to suck them dry. Most dogs I'm familiar with that come from very poor countries are stronger simply because of slightly more natural selection processes, exactly the opposite of this country where we so often make excuses for weakness and treat every illness/weakness instead of letting nature take its course. Just another perspective from a know-nothing woman.

by yoshy on 19 January 2010 - 00:01
and i do not get caught up in the 'bad ass dogs" as you stated. I never have. if you read my above post you would see that.
and to the money aspect you would see i commented on that as well as i have pretrained/ built up many rescue dogs for our state troopers here. As they are low budget and dont want to deal with bidding and politics of buying dogs here. they just give us a tax credit.
i understand those aspects fairly well.

by Keith Grossman on 19 January 2010 - 03:01
Wow. And there we have it...

by Jenni78 on 19 January 2010 - 03:01
Typical- take one line out of a whole paragraph and try to spin off on a tangent about it to further distract and derail the thread. Ignore all I said about natural selection via harsh living conditions and focus on one part of a sentence and skew the meaning. Perhaps you should be in politics


To remind you of what I actually said, as opposed to the way you attempted to paint it: ...".though I kind of disagee w/the importance you are placing on hip xrays, etc. I'd call dogs living/thriving in this kind of environment fairly strong, and I would think that especially people w/nothing would certainly not be allowing useless dogs to suck them dry. Most dogs I'm familiar with that come from very poor countries are stronger simply because of slightly more natural selection processes, exactly the opposite of this country where we so often make excuses for weakness and treat every illness/weakness instead of letting nature take its course. Just another perspective from a know-nothing woman."
by Gustav on 19 January 2010 - 13:01

by Jenni78 on 19 January 2010 - 13:01


by Keith Grossman on 19 January 2010 - 14:01
Yes, because someone who owned his first GSD before she was born and brought his next dog back to the U.S. from Germany with him in 1986 couldn't possibly have more insight than someone just getting started in the breed.


by MaxBear on 19 January 2010 - 14:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top