Are Titles Necessary Before Breeding? - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by EchoMeadows on 11 January 2007 - 20:01

I don't know what your alternative is, quite frankly it does not matter to me, It only matters to you. As it should be. I know what my dogs are and are not capable of, I represent them to the best of my ability as does any breeder including the Major Leagues !! You can't even argue with that. Major Leagues don't ALWAYS Get "Perfect" dogs spook !! Don't even make that claim, to do so would only further proove your inexpeirience. Yes I'm a "Newbie", So what does that mean I love my dogs any less than any Major leaguer ?? Doubt it ! And you would claim that to be so. Wanna keep going, or have I made my Point ??

by EchoMeadows on 11 January 2007 - 20:01

Quite frankly Spook, You keep missing the point, While I too agree that Titles and KKL are important I do not beleive them to be the END ALL, Further more these are MY feelings, Nothing you can do about that. Just as you have YOUR feelings nothing anyone can do about that. Beyond that even Your feelings are just as valid as My feelings, they are what they are feelings !!! Feelings are not Facts Period, they are simply feelings NO RIGHT NO WRONG, Did you study Phsycology at all ?? your not showing it if you did. Just how educated are you Spook ? This is the most simple and basic Phsyc study there is. I'll say it again so you get it clearly, Titles and KKL are good Tools (in my opinion) However it is also my "feeling" that they are not the holy grail "END ALL" Sch3 and KKL1 = Breedworthy Absolutely. NOT in my opinion. many things come into play and to deny that Spook, once again shows your inexpeirience and lack of willingness to learn. At least I continue to further my education and keep an open mind.

by spook101 on 11 January 2007 - 22:01

Echo, I guarentee my formal education level far surpasses yours. I don't know why you would bring it up, except as an attempt to intimidate or embarass. Quite frankly, anyone that misspells words such as psychology in an attempt to show their superior intelligence simply looks the fool. Take the time to review your own spelling and grammar if that's what your concern is. If it's just a way of attacking my post or diverting attention from your weak answer you may want to reconsider. Further, I was training dogs when your mother was still wiping your...nose.

by EchoMeadows on 11 January 2007 - 23:01

I don't worry about minor details such as typo's sorry. I'm glad you've been training that long, shows you have dedication to the breed. But don't think for one minute that you are any better or further educated than anyone on this board, or you would be proven the fool. You don't know most of these people neighther do I. I would never claim to be further educated, Simply asked a question, No intimidation sorry you took it that way. Weak answer... well that's your Feeling/opinion. Your entitled, seems funny though that you never seem to address all of any post. You only wish to focus on what parts you care to disect and don't even address the rest of it. Why is that ? just curious.

by spook101 on 12 January 2007 - 01:01

Quite honestly I don't respond to all of what you write because a large amount of it is incoherent and convoluted. If there was any particular portion you feel needed to be addressed please try to communicate it intelligently and I'll respond.

by spook101 on 12 January 2007 - 01:01

Quite honestly I don't respond to all of what you write because a large amount of it is incoherent and convoluted. If there was any particular portion you feel needed to be addressed please try to communicate it intelligently and I'll respond.

by EchoMeadows on 12 January 2007 - 02:01

I felt this was a valid question, But was not surprised that you did not respond. Will you now ? Seen some Major leaguers that don't take pups back, That's Ethical ??

by spook101 on 12 January 2007 - 03:01

In all fairness you would have to be more specific about the circumstances, but most folks have already indicated that they would rather take back a pup than leave it in an unwanted home. Yes, there may be some that wouldn't. What does the fact that you'll take back you dogs make up for the fact that you don't title, korklasse or train?

by EchoMeadows on 12 January 2007 - 06:01

I do train, I am working for Titles, Once we get the Titles plan to even KKL just not there yet. So what do you mean ?

by Rellek on 12 January 2007 - 06:01

I just wanted to pop in and point out that when someone states that their "formal education far surpasses" blah blah blah...they may want to make sure they spell *guarantee* correctly. Ok, ya'll can go back to arguing about who is more intelligent/ethical etc.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top