
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by raymond on 04 August 2009 - 00:08
by SitasMomsSon on 04 August 2009 - 00:08
MFV, this has actually gone somewhere, where I clearly explained how President Obama's agenda can properly defined as socialist, which, for your veiwing pleasure, I will once agian post.
While very many people misuse the word socialism, it can still be used to describe our current president’s agenda. Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary describes socialism as
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods 2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
Using any of these definitions in conjunction with what has thus far happened under the current presidency you can define President Obama’s policy as socialist.You should also keep in mind, that when people misuse the word socialism, what they almost always mean is liberal. Being liberal has nothing to do with race.
For definition 1 consider the federal takeover of the banks and automotive companies. Those companies are now under governmental ownership and administration, whereas the government now controls the means of production and distribution of goods, the goods in this instance being automotive vehicles. While some may argue that the government only exercises control on some goods and not the whole economy, one must remember that this is still increasing governmental ownership and thereby this can still be a socialist act.
For definition 2, one must realize that President Obama is intending on following the current course, and is in no means planning to change his demeanor. While some may argue that his agenda does not state that he will continue to exercise governmental control, one must remember that most of his agenda is not currently, and will never be attempted under his name. A human can only be defined by his actions and not his plans. A man born in Austria had very ambitious plans to save the country that he resided in from an economic disaster. While his agenda sounded good, one must remember that the actions that this man, who many know as Adolf Hitler, are what caused the mass deaths of millions of non-Aryan people. This being settled, President Obama’s previous actions in the automotive and banking industries can only lead one to believe that he will continue to pursue governmental ownership of industries, eventually leading to a system of society or group living in which there is no property that is not owned by the government.
For definition 3, one must reassert the principle stated in my analysis of definition 2; a mans only merit is his actions. This being said, President Obama, and his band of merry democrats are pushing the United States of America away from the capitalist economy that it was founded upon, and towards a communist economy, thereby the current economy can be described as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done.
So, while very many people misuse the term socialist, there can be no doubt that the term can be used justly when referring to our current president, Barack Hussein Obama II
The claim that I am racist due to the fact that I used our presidents proper name is absolutly absurd, I used his full name, the name that he was born with, and

by sueincc on 04 August 2009 - 00:08

by RatPackKing on 04 August 2009 - 00:08
Where were you when some libs on this forum have continously called President Bush "retard"? Do you not find that crude and hateful in consideration of those parent with mentally challenge children?
RPK

by MaggieMae on 04 August 2009 - 01:08
MVF said --
Not going anywhere.
-----------------------------
....and just WHERE did you want the conversation to go.....to be in agreement w/you? NO WAY !! You just don't understand and probably never will.
Liberals and Conservatives will NEVER AGREE. We have a completely different set of values. Please don't start giving examples of "those" who have strayed from their values/morals because for every Republican you Name, I can Name a Democrat. I am talking about the average American who is hard-working with a good work ethic, law-abiding, believes in God, Loves their Country, Respects the Flag, Loves their family and doesn't think of babies as "parasites" to be scraped and/or vacuumed away or actually being born alive -- then tossed in the garbage. I have absolutely NOTHING in common with a Liberal. I think they are the "scum of the Earth" and they are destroying this wonderful, beautiful Country.
Earlier, I was watching several videos of Town Hall meetings w/Senators & Reps -- the people are Mad as Hell !! They are saying "Silent No More" !

by sueincc on 04 August 2009 - 01:08

by RatPackKing on 04 August 2009 - 01:08
I'm not trying to justify any racist comments........now don't get all "mystere" on me

RPK

by RatPackKing on 04 August 2009 - 01:08
by trace755 on 22 July 2009 - 16:07
trace755
Posts: 154
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 07:25 pm
You can salute him when he goes to the stockade. That were he deserves to go just like the men who wouldn't serve under George the retard.
This is but one example........again Sue, you posted before and after this post..........In fact you use the word fucktard.........I'm very disappointed........lol!!!!!!...........I'll give you a pass, cuz I know you are passionate and sometime hot headed.
RPK

by MaggieMae on 04 August 2009 - 02:08
RPK -- you are always giving Sue "a pass" -- Stand Up for what you believe in without apologizing and giving "Passes" -- geez -- that is how "we" got Obama -- the Media always gave/still giving him a "Pass."

by RatPackKing on 04 August 2009 - 02:08
I just happen to know Sue away from the politics, and sort of taken a liken to her regarless of her political stands.
RPK

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top