
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by MaggieMae on 20 July 2009 - 23:07
by jaggirl47 on 21 July 2009 - 00:07
Raymond, since you want to try to put me down talking about fighting with lipstick, I don't even wear makeup you dumbass. Second, I have served in Iraq as a medic and was a medic for an all male infantry company because they were short medics which is how I EARNED my Combat Medical Badge.
Now, I am a nurse in the Army and take care of my guys further back. Unless you have actually served out there and have seen what we do, thenYOU are the one who watches too much BSNBC.
My husband is currently on another deployment to Iraq and is very proud of the job he does out there. So am I and so many other people. YOU are in the VAST minority. It might help to have actual first hand experience in something before you spout your stupidity.
As far as the WTC, it collapsed from the top, not the bottom. Watch the footage. And are you trying to say that my Uncle, a decorated retired Navy Officer, was just "seeing things" on 9-11?
You are an idiot
by Uglydog on 21 July 2009 - 00:07
The Few, the Proud, The Gay..winning hearts and minds. Occupation, Israeli ZOG style.
Torture photos: US soldiers raped, sodomized Iraqi prisoners
By Tom Eley
29 May 2009
In an interview with the British newspaper the Daily Telegraph published Wednesday, former US General Antonio Taguba said that photographs the Obama administration is seeking to suppress show images of US soldiers raping and sodomizing Iraqi prisoners.
Taguba, who conducted the military inquiry of prisoner abuse at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in 2004 after some photos of US soldiers torturing prisoners became public, said that among the photos are images of soldiers raping a female prisoner, raping a male detainee, and committing “sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and phosphorescent tube,” according to the Telegraph.
Gen. Taguba said even the description of the photos is explosive. “These pictures show torture, abuse, rape and every indecency,” Taguba said. “The mere description of these pictures is horrendous enough, take my word for it.”
Taguba’s revelations expose the deceit of President Barack Obama’s claim, used to justify the photos’ suppression, that they “are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib.” In all, it is believed that there are some 2,000 photographs depicting about 400 cases of US military personnel torturing Iraqis and Afghans at seven military prisons. The Bush administration, and now Obama, have sought to block publication of the images.
Obama also claimed that “the most direct consequence of releasing them...would be to inflame anti-American public opinion and to put our troops in greater danger.” While this may likely be true, the criminal nature of the US occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan is already well known by the nations’ populations, who have died and been made refugees in the hundreds of thousands since being invaded in 2003 and 2001, respectively. Indeed, this claim only exposes the true nature of the US occupations: they have never been about establishing democracy, but aimed at stamping out resistance to US control of the strategically important nations through mass bloodletting and terror, the historical modus operandi of every imperialist occupying power.
However, the central reason Obama has chosen to fight the photos’ release is that top US generals announced their opposition to their publication. The generals’ intervention came in the midst of increasingly open dissension from the ranks of the military-intelligence apparatus over Obama’s handling of “the war on terror.” After Obama released four Bush administration legal memos justifying torture, a campaign, spearheaded by Bush Vice President Dick Cheney, was launched, appealing to the military brass and spies. Obama responded by promising he would block any investigation of the previous administration’s carefully crafted and controlled torture policies. He then reversed an earlier decision to not appeal a judge’s ruling in response to an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) freedom of information lawsuit launched in 2004, which demanded the release of dozens of the torture photos.
An Obama Pentagon spokesman denied that the suppressed images depict rape, while a carefully worded statement seemed to indicate other photos depict precisely such actions. Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Telegraph “has completely mischaracterized the images.... None of the photos in question depict the images that are described in that article.” Whitman did not specifically deny Taguba’s claims.
by Uglydog on 21 July 2009 - 01:07
A foreign soldier (Likely a Russian Jew Israeli by his accent and uniform) tells ABC reporters..
'Nothing informations, the building is going to Collapse'
Now How in the Hell did he or anyone know the building was going to collapse?
Fire had never caused a steel building to collapse.
Perhaps this Russian Jew Israeli was Psychic. Or in on it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD6F_X1Okfo

by MaggieMae on 21 July 2009 - 02:07
Ranting imbecile.................
by jaggirl47 on 21 July 2009 - 05:07

by steve1 on 21 July 2009 - 07:07
The UK Government know this but say what they have is adequate, I say let the likes of PM Brown and Co put on the uniform and get out there among it, they have never done a days service fighting for there country between them they would soon change there bloody minds that i guarantee, I know and i wish the Guys well and be safe and come back home in one piece from both the USA and the UK
Steve

by raymond on 21 July 2009 - 14:07
by Uglydog on 21 July 2009 - 15:07
The Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane, WTC #7 was brought down by Explosives, and the Media in America is controlled.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E

by Jessie James on 21 July 2009 - 15:07
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top