interesting article

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Shtal on 10 October 2012 - 16:10

by zdog on 10 October 2012 - 16:10

they don't carbon date dinosaur fossils because because of the half life of Carbon 14. It's only accurate to things about 50,000 years old or younger. Anything older than that, such as a dinosaur fossil, wouldn't have enough carbon 14 left to accurately determine an "age"

Carbon, and many other isotopes break down on a very regular schedule and can be very accurate in determining the ages of things. I guess it doesn't make much sense to get into it any further with someone that is clinging so strongly to something they are incapable of seeing things any other way.

by Shtal on 10 October 2012 - 17:10

I hope this will clear your mind...

zdog wrote: I guess it doesn't make much sense to get into it any further

Correct because zdog affraid of truth!
And I guarantee zdog has not explanation....

by Two Moons on 10 October 2012 - 17:10

The never ending merry go round continues, how many times can you repeat yourself shital?

Red sable,
what does a horror movie or a horoscope have to do with anything?

If there is no god how could there be a devil?

And ghosts?

Do you know anyonw who believes in ghosts?
Other than religious folk.

by Two Moons on 10 October 2012 - 17:10

I read this the other day,
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2012/oct/09/imagine-theres-no-religion-20-do/?partner=popular

by GSDtravels on 10 October 2012 - 18:10

Shtal, you really are funny. How do figure that disproving evolution proves creation? WRONG again! One shred of evidence and you can't come up with it, can you?

Why do you insist on prestenting Kent Hovind's BS? He's been PROVEN WRONG, over and over and over again, he's a snake oil salesman! And even still, he's not trying to prove creation, he's attempting (and badly, might I add) to DISprove evolution. Not the same thing, sorry.

by Felloffher on 10 October 2012 - 18:10

Kent Hovind is a convicted felon (58 counts) and is serving a 10 year sentence. He has never submitted any of his claims for peer review among the scientific community, he misrepresents the facts and is a fraud in every sence of the word. No one in the scientific community takes him seriously, because he's a complete moron.

Shital,

You're a brainwashed fool and accepting Hovind's lies as truth proves this. I would suggest you step away from the Christian websites and do some fact checking before you post further nonsence. Every claim that Hovind has made against the accuracy of carbon dating can and has been refuted. Bombarding us with more lies isn't going to make it true.

by GSDtravels on 10 October 2012 - 18:10

Red Sable, what does it prove if someone believes in God, ghosts, tooth fairies or Santa Claus? Do you think that proves it's true? Do you really care whether there's any truth to what you believe? Don't you think that's kink of important or don't you care if it's true or not?

by Shtal on 10 October 2012 - 18:10

Anybody could talk alot, but I prefer results...
End of story.

btw, conviction of Kent has nothing to do with science, you are trying to switch subjects.

by GSDtravels on 10 October 2012 - 18:10

No Shtal, you're evading because you have no proof and you never will.

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

interesting article - Page 6

Pedigree Database