
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by carol b on 19 November 2006 - 11:11
by LilyDexter on 20 November 2006 - 11:11

by Videx on 20 November 2006 - 21:11
by Sting on 21 November 2006 - 01:11
by LilyDexter on 22 November 2006 - 12:11
by VKFGSD on 14 August 2007 - 20:08
LilyDexter and Videx,
Back in the "old days" when the homegrown English lines started to experience epilepsy ( the dog mentioned above and I think one of the Delridge (sp) dogs) did not the GSDLeague purhase some of the dogs so Willis could study the mode of inheritance? It seems to me in the vet world we are often reinventing the wheel because there is no memory or research of what has come before.
Yes there are different kinds of epilepsy in different breeds. Historically in the GSD epilepsy was late onset (after 2-3 years of age) which is part of what made it difficult to remove from the genome since dogs had often been bred before it raised it's ugly head. If I remember right what Willis determined was that it had a threshold inheritance pattern. For example 10 genes might be involved with a minimum of 4-5 before seizures would occur. Males appeared to have a lower threshold than females and started to fit at an early age and more severely. Since you guys are in England, you have the resource at your finger tips - email him.
Re the "ideal" situation of a "picked clean" genome to produce the perfect dog - make haste slowly. Some interesting research has been done on Cystic Fibrosis and Tay Sachs diseases. The question posed was this - Since these are obviously fatal diseases why do they persist in the genome since truly fatal diseases breed themselves out of existence? They went back and looked at the historical populations that that gave rise to these diseases and found in the case of Tay Sachs those populations were subject to periodic epidemics of dysentry and similiar diseases. Tay sachs is an abnomality in how the body handles fluids and fats. What they found is a carrier with one copy of the gene actually would survive the dystentery epidemics because their bodies did not become dehydrated in the same way as someone w/o the gene. Re Cystic Fibrosis something very similar except the diease was TB. The CF gene increases mucus in the lungs. With one copy of the gene it actually is a protection vs TB. You think this might be handy to know now that we are facing an epidemic of drug resistant TB? So yes make haste slowly - make sure you understand what the gene brings to the table and do not just off the hand label it bad gene.
Related to this and some other parts of the conversation above - jimho - I will take a long coat any day to some of the very serious health problems we have in our breed. Again imho - the coat disqualification (wh/ has no historical basis if you are a collector and student of the old standards) was a way of reviving a world market that had become saturated with German Dogs. Eliminate coats w/ about a 25% penetrance in the breed and bingo whamo that's 25% more dogs we can sell. Gad I've gotten old and cynical.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top