
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Prager on 16 December 2009 - 21:12
At least here we still have it. It come with some negatives but alternative is much worse. I would not be a participant of a PDB or any other such entity which would ban people for speech I do not care how of bad of a speech. I would bring a memories which I do not care to remember.
If you are free you do not need to read his posts. You should have that discipline. I do not care for Raymond's nasty remarks myself. He is what he is. He says what he says. Best way to disarm him is to ignore him.
Censorship on governmental or this level is probably the worst form of oppression.
Prager Hans

by sueincc on 16 December 2009 - 21:12
Make a REAL liar out of me CB, don't bother me. Is this clear enough for you?

by raymond on 16 December 2009 - 21:12

by sueincc on 16 December 2009 - 22:12

by Prager on 16 December 2009 - 22:12
Prager Hans

by raymond on 16 December 2009 - 22:12
Her name is Sue how do you do! No sue I do not get off on feuds! But you see I am from the mountains and like Jose Wales I live by the feud. Besides I got Hatfield blood from my fathers side! I just sick and tired of yous others cutting each other up! True I do not have to read it but that is a two way street!

by sueincc on 16 December 2009 - 22:12

by Red Sable on 16 December 2009 - 22:12

Prager, I disagree though, some of this stuff is personal and dirty.

by raymond on 16 December 2009 - 22:12
by Setanta on 16 December 2009 - 22:12
Banning is silly. Would you ban your child from the house because they keep having tantrums, or would you find a way to not give so much attention to the bad behaviour and only reward when behaviour etc is acceptable. The harder thing to do is to resist posting responses, however justified they may seem. Last time I post a response to anything re this for sure.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top